Electric Field of a cube with a rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field at a distance of 2 cm from the center of a long copper rod with a radius of 1 cm is measured at 3 N/C, directed outward. The linear charge density (λ) on the rod is calculated to be 3.34 x 10-12 C/m. Using Gauss's law, the electric flux (φ) through a cube with a side length of 5 cm, which the rod passes through perpendicularly, is determined to be 1.89 x 10-2 Nm/C. The discussion emphasizes that the shape of the Gaussian surface does not affect the total flux as long as the enclosed charge remains constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its applications
  • Familiarity with electric fields and flux calculations
  • Knowledge of linear charge density concepts
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for solving integrals related to electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for cylindrical charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of electric flux and its implications in different geometries
  • Investigate the effects of external charges on electric flux through closed surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as engineers and researchers dealing with electric field analysis and charge distributions.

doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


The electric field at 2 cm from the center of long copper rod of radius 1 cm has a magnitude ##3 \frac{N}{C}## and directed outward from the axis of the rod. (a) How much charge per unit length exists on the copper rod? (b) What would be the electric flux through a cube of side 5 cm situated such that the rod passes through opposite sides of the cube perpendicularly?

Homework Equations


For a cylindrical symmetry: $$\phi = 2\pi rLE$$$$\phi = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}$$$$\lambda = 2\pi r\epsilon_0 E$$
Where ##\lambda## is the linear charge density, ##\phi## is the flux, and L is the length.

I know I am missing an equation, which is the equation I am trying to find.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first part, I solved for ##\lambda## to be ##3.34\times10^{-12}\frac{C}{m}##. I know that this must be used in the second part, but I am unsure of how to include the cube into the equation.

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doggydan42 said:
but I am unsure of how to include the cube into the equation.
Are you familiar with "Gaussian surfaces"? If the cube is replaced by a rectangular box still length 5cm parallel to the rod but 10cm in the other two directions, would the flux through it be more, the same, or less?
 
doggydan42 said:
I know that this must be used in the second part, but I am unsure of how to include the cube into the equation.
Does Gauss's law care what the shape of the Gaussian surface is?
 
Recalls the physical interpretation of Gauss's theorem: flow is the closed charge into the surface divided by epsilon. Can you calculate these charge?

Another thing, when the closed electric charge inside the surface is the same, is important the shape of the surface to calculate the total flow?
 
Oh. So the charge enclosed would just be ##q_{enc}=\lambda L##, where L is the length of the cube. Right? Since if I understand correctly, it doesn't matter what shape it is, as long as the charge enclosed is the same.

So if I solved this correctly, then:
$$\phi=\frac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}=\frac{\lambda L}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{(3.34\times 10^{-12} \frac{C}{m})(0.05 m)}{8.85\times 10^{-12}\frac{C^2}{Nm^2}}
\\ \phi=1.89\times 10^{-2} \frac{Nm}{c}$$

If not what am I missing? Also, how would external charges affect the flux, since the rod extends past the cube?

Thank you.
 
doggydan42 said:
how would external charges affect the flux, since the rod extends past the cube?
By symmetry, the field lines are all perpendicular to the axis of the rod, so flux from other parts of the rod do not enter the cube. Also, more generally, a line of flux from any charge external to the cube must enter and exit it an equal number of times, so produces no net flux.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
749
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
960
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
972
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K