Electric Field on the Axis at Certain Point

Click For Summary
Two point charges, +8 nC and -17 nC, are located on the x-axis at x = 0 and x = +10 m, respectively. The electric field at point x = +5.0 m is calculated using the formula E = k(q/r^2). The correct approach involves summing the contributions from both charges, leading to the realization that both fields point to the right. The final calculation yields an electric field of approximately 8.99 N/C. The confusion arose from the placement of brackets and the need to add the electric fields from both charges.
chunkytuna21
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Two point-charges of +8 nC and -17 nC lie on the x-axis at points x = 0 and x = +10 m, respectively. Find the electric field on the axis at point x = +5.0 m. Assume vacuum. Answer in N/C.

E= k0(q./r^2)

Ok, this should be pretty simple, but for some reason it's not. First, I converted the nC to C: +8E-9 and -1.7E-8. I assume the radius is +5 which would then be +25 because it's squared. K0 is 8.99*10^9, right? Then I just plugged in my values:

E= -1.7E-8/25 + 8E-9/25= -3.6E-10
-3.6E-10 * 8.99E9= 3.2364

This answer is wrong though. I've tried entering it in as both a positive and negative number, but that doesn't make a difference. Where am I going wrong? This is the only way I can see to solve the problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the E field due to the positive left charge is to the right.
The E field due to the negative charge on the right is to the right as well.
So you add the two fields.

Leaving out the k and putting the brackets in the wrong place confused me, maybe you as well. Look at it this way:
E = kQ/R^2 + kQ/R^2
= k*8E-9/5^2 + k*17E-9/5^2
= k/25*25E-9
= 8.99 N/C
 
Thanks! I would've never guessed to add them. I'll take out those brackets too. Now that I look at it, they are kind of confusing.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
941
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K