Electric Field Plastic Rod Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a long, thin, nonconducting plastic rod bent into a circular loop with a small gap. Participants are examining how to calculate the electric field at the center of the loop due to a uniformly distributed positive charge along the loop, while considering the implications of the gap.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of integration to find the electric field, questioning the need to adjust the limits of integration due to the gap. There is discussion about the implications of removing a portion of the loop and how it affects the electric field. Some participants also raise questions about the concept of infinite charge density and its physical relevance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants suggest considering the electric field contributions from the gap, while others propose simplifying assumptions. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific numerical values, which complicates the integration process. The discussion also touches on the theoretical aspects of charge density and its implications in the context of the problem.

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hello:

Can someone help with this? A long, thin, nonconducting plastic rod is bent into a circular loop that has radius a. Between the ends of the rod a short gap of length l, where l << a remains. A positive test charge of magnitude Q is evenly distributed on the loop. What's the magnitude tof E at the center of the loop?

I don't think we can use Gauss' law for this, because the rod is not connected? So does this mean that we should use dE = k*dq/r^2, and dq = ads, and ds = ad(theta) and integrate? But instead of theta being from 0 to 2*pi, we need to find the theta that is represented by the l, which is I guess l/a for very small theta.

Also, I read in the book that the electric field is discontinuous at any location with an infinite volume charge density. Can someone explain that? How can there be an infinite volume charge density? Is it like when R goes to zero or something?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why don't you want to do the integral?
sounds like you would know the field if integral ran from 0 to 2pi ;
You know that 0 to theta is the same as (0 to 2pi) -minus- (2pi to theta)

Nature doesn't really have INFINITE charge density,
but it can be pretty dense in a nucleus (16E-18 C / 3fm^3)
 
For the first one, it seems you aren't given any numbers. So, definitely your integral would look very awkward if you were to do it. So I suggest that you think of it as a complete loop. Then the E-field in the centre is 0. When you remove a small arc portion of the loop, there is nothing to cancel out the E-field due to a small of arc of similar shap and size on the opposite side of the circle. Just find the E-field due to that small portion and you're done.

As for the second, if you know that the volume charge density is also given by [tex]\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = p_v[/tex], you can easily see what this means when the RHS approaches infinity. What does this mean for the LHS?
 
Hello:

So for the first one, I find the normal equation for a loop of length 2*pi*a + l, and figure out what the new radius would be. Which would be (2*pi*a + l)/2*pi. And then I would use the equation for the loop and then figure out the portion of the field that length l represents?

And for the second one, do you mean that the delta is the change in density? So does this mean that the distance from the charge to whatever you are measuring goes to 0?

Thanks.
 
Sorry, I think the r is still a, so I just find the portion of the loop with length l and the field that it represents. But the r is still a. I think that is good?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K