Electric field strength and direction problem (need help)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strengths and directions from three point charges. Participants emphasize the importance of breaking down the electric fields into their x and y components and summing them correctly to find the net electric field. There is a caution about ensuring the correct signs for the components based on the direction of the electric fields. The use of trigonometric functions is discussed, particularly the confusion surrounding the angle used in the calculations. A clear diagram and proper labeling of components are recommended to avoid misunderstandings in the calculations.
ks81
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New user has been reminded to always show their work when posting schoolwork questions
Homework Statement
Electric field strength and direction problem
Relevant Equations
E= k * q/r^2
9A157652-6312-46DC-9E49-A0BC447704FD.jpeg

E1= 9.0 x 10^9 * 10 x 10^-9 / (0.045)^2 = 45000. x cos(153.43)=
E2= 9.0 x 10^9 * 10 x 10^-9 / (0.02)^2= 22500 x cos(180)=
E3= 9.0 x 10^9 * 5.0 x 10^-9 / (0.04)^2= 28125 x cos(90)= ?

Enet= ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please write a more detailed attempt at solution.

If I understand correctly at this attempt you try to calculate the three y-components of the three electric fields due to each of the three charges.
You must also write the three x-components and then sum the three y-components to calculate a total y-component, and similarly to calculate a total x-component.
 
Further to @Delta2's reply, use commonsense to check your signs. It is very easy to get those wrong. E.g., which way should the field from the lower right charge point, up the page or down? (I'm not saying have that wrong, just that it is worth checking.)
Also, there is rarely any merit in finding the numeric value of an angle. You can find their trig functions with simple geometry.
 
In addition to @haruspex's and @Delta2's replies, it seems that you are magnitudes of vectors with their components. For example
ks81 said:
E1= 9.0 x 10^9 * 10 x 10^-9 / (0.045)^2 = 45000. x cos(153.43)=
The number .0 x 10^9 * 10 x 10^-9 / (0.045)^2 is equal to about 45000 and is equal to the magnitude of E1. Where did cos(153.43) come from? If you meant to write the x or y component of E1, then put down
E1x=E1*(some trig function)
E1y=E1*(some other trig function)
Otherwise you will probably get confused about what it is that you are calculating.
 
kuruman said:
Where did cos(153.43) come from?
I think ##\theta=26.57## is the angle of the diagonal with one of the sides of the parallelogram with sides 2 and 4. for some reason he takes ##cos(180-\theta)## not sure if this gives the y-component of the electric field of the charge at the bottom left corner. I thought so at the moment I was writing post #2.
 
Delta2 said:
I think ##\theta=26.57## is the angle of the diagonal with one of the sides of the parallelogram with sides 2 and 4. for some reason he takes ##cos(180-\theta)## not sure if this gives the y-component of the electric field of the charge at the bottom left corner. I thought so at the moment I was writing post #2.
That may be so, however this
ks81 said:
9.0 x 10^9 * 10 x 10^-9 / (0.045)^2 = 45000. x cos(153.43)
is not correct unless cos(153.43) = 1 which is clearly not the case. That is why I suggested that OP starts with E1x or E1y on the LHS rather than the magnitude E1.
 
Before even starting the calculations you should draw the forces or fields on the figure and label them. Don't expect people to guess what do you mean by E1, E2, E3 etc. As it is, they can be anything. Are these components, magnitudes? Without axes, how do we know which is x and which is y component?
 
Back
Top