Coulomb's Law Grade 12 Question -- Net Electric Field affecting a Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to Coulomb's Law and the calculation of the net electric field acting on a charge due to other charges in a given distribution. Participants are examining the vector nature of electric fields and the appropriate methods for calculating resultant forces and fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to consider electric fields as vectors, prompting questions about the correct application of equations and the use of the Pythagorean theorem for calculating magnitudes and directions. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between force and electric field, as well as the importance of units in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the vector nature of electric fields and the necessity of calculating forces due to individual charges. Some participants express confusion about the correct formulas and methods, while others offer insights into the calculations and the importance of sketching the problem for clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of electric field calculations, including the need to account for vector directions and the significance of using correct units. There is mention of textbook examples that may not align perfectly with the current problem, leading to some uncertainty in the application of formulas.

David John
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Examine the charge distribution shown.
b) What is the net electric field acting on charge 1?

Homework Equations


I used the equation E= (kq1/r^2) + (kq2/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I subbed 9.0 x 10^9 in for k, 3.0 x 10^-5 for both q1 and q2, and 2m for r.
My final answer was 135000N/C
Just want to check if my answer is right or if I'm messing something up. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    19.3 KB · Views: 832
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
David John said:
Just want to check if my answer is right
You can do that yourself.
David John said:
My final answer was 135000N/C
Not even close. And your relevant equation misses a very important feature...
 
BvU said:
You can do that yourself.
Not even close. And your relevant equation misses a very important feature...

Can you let me know what I did wrong?
 
a very important detail is that the electric field is a vector field. you have to solve this by components, and use the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude and direction of the field.
 
razidan said:
a very important detail is that the electric field is a vector field. you have to solve this by components, and use the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude and direction of the field.

I'm sorry but I am really lost. So do I use pythagorean theorem to find the r value, then sub it into my equation. And after that, state the direction using theta?
 
David John said:
I'm sorry but I am really lost. So do I use pythagorean theorem to find the r value, then sub it into my equation. And after that, state the direction using theta?

The forces acting on q1 are due to the fields emanating from q2 and q3 separately! thanks to superposition, the net force is just the (vector) sum of the two.
lucky for you, the question is set up so that the fields at q1 are orthogonal to each other.
so calculate each one separately, and the use the pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude and direction.
 
razidan said:
The forces acting on q1 are due to the fields emanating from q2 and q3 separately! thanks to superposition, the net force is just the (vector) sum of the two.
lucky for you, the question is set up so that the fields at q1 are orthogonal to each other.
so calculate each one separately, and the use the pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude and direction.

Not sure if this is what you mean but I used E=kq/r^2 to find the magnitude of q2 and q3. Then I used pythagorean theorem with the two magnitudes I found (both were 16875. So the magnitude of q1 was 23864.9. Is this what you meant or am I still messing this up?
 
David John said:
Not sure if this is what you mean but I used E=kq/r^2 to find the magnitude of q2 and q3. Then I used pythagorean theorem with the two magnitudes I found (both were 16875. So the magnitude of q1 was 23864.9. Is this what you meant or am I still messing this up?
The charges q2 and q3 are given, you have to find the electric forces due to q2 and q3. How do you calculate them? In what units?
upload_2018-3-6_5-53-52.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-6_5-53-52.png
    upload_2018-3-6_5-53-52.png
    42 KB · Views: 2,357
ehild said:
The charges q2 and q3 are given, you have to find the electric forces due to q2 and q3. How do you calculate them? In what units?
View attachment 221473

In my textbook, a similar example is given and the equation Enet = (kq1/r1^2) + (kq2/r2^2) was used. That's why I
ehild said:
The charges q2 and q3 are given, you have to find the electric forces due to q2 and q3. How do you calculate them? In what units?
View attachment 221473

I'm not sure what formula to use. I think the final units will be in C or N/C
 
  • #10
David John said:
In my textbook, a similar example is given and the equation Enet = (kq1/r1^2) + (kq2/r2^2) was used. That's why II'm not sure what formula to use. I think the final units will be in C or N/C
The equation for Enet is not correct. The electric fields add up as vectors!
N/C is unit of electric field strength, but C is the unit of charge. They are not the same!
 
  • #11
David John said:
In my textbook, a similar example is given and the equation Enet = (kq1/r1^2) + (kq2/r2^2) was used. That's why II'm not sure what formula to use. I think the final units will be in C or N/C

Units are very important! if i ask you how far away are you, and you answer "3 oranges"... that doesn't really make sense, does it?
you have to know what units you are looking for. if they ask you what the force is on the particle, your answer has to have units of force (such as N or dyne, etc).

now, about the numerical values that you got - they are waaaay to big. look at the value of the charges, on the order of 10^-5. that's 0.00001. very small.
So try again, try inputting the right constants into your calculator and see what you get
(BTW, using the wrong numbers that you got, you did go through the right procedure to find the magnitude, except the answer is wrong).
 
  • #12
razidan said:
Units are very important! if i ask you how far away are you, and you answer "3 oranges"... that doesn't really make sense, does it?
you have to know what units you are looking for. if they ask you what the force is on the particle, your answer has to have units of force (such as N or dyne, etc).

now, about the numerical values that you got - they are waaaay to big. look at the value of the charges, on the order of 10^-5. that's 0.00001. very small.
So try again, try inputting the right constants into your calculator and see what you get
(BTW, using the wrong numbers that you got, you did go through the right procedure to find the magnitude, except the answer is wrong).

I'm not sure if this is right either but I tried using a different formula, here are my steps:
Fnet = kq1q2/r2
= (9.0 x 10^9)(2.0 x 10^-5)(3.0 x 10^-5) / (2)^2
= 1.35 N
This is the magnitude between q1 and q3 as well, so I then used pythagorean theorem to find the final magnitude which I found to be 1.91 N. Am I getting closer or is this still wrong?
 
  • #13
David John said:
I'm not sure if this is right either but I tried using a different formula, here are my steps:
Fnet = kq1q2/r2
= (9.0 x 10^9)(2.0 x 10^-5)(3.0 x 10^-5) / (2)^2
= 1.35 N
This is the magnitude between q1 and q3 as well, so I then used pythagorean theorem to find the final magnitude which I found to be 1.91 N. Am I getting closer or is this still wrong?
this is right. what about the direction?
It is helpful to sketch the problem and draw arrows, representing the forces due to each charge.
 
  • #14
Okay, I decided to just write it all out on paper so I can show what I'm doing. Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    24.7 KB · Views: 671
  • #15
David John said:
Okay, I decided to just write it all out on paper so I can show what I'm doing. Is this correct?
This is correct.
 
  • #16
razidan said:
This is correct.

I was wondering if the vector arrows I drew are in the right direction? Should the vectors be acting on q1 instead?
 
  • #17
David John said:
I was wondering if the vector arrows I drew are in the right direction? Should the vectors be acting on q1 instead?

Also, for the first part, it asks for the net force acting on charge 1. Isn't what I sent a photo of answer the first part of the question. I saw on another website that to find the net electric field, I have to take the net force and divide it by q1 to get a final answer in N/C. Is this right?
 
  • #18
David John said:
I was wondering if the vector arrows I drew are in the right direction? Should the vectors be acting on q1 instead?
They are correct. opposite charges attract, so q1 is feeling an attraction force, being pulled towards q2 and q3, so the arrows representing the force should also be pointed towards q2 and q3.

David John said:
Also, for the first part, it asks for the net force acting on charge 1. Isn't what I sent a photo of answer the first part of the question. I saw on another website that to find the net electric field, I have to take the net force and divide it by q1 to get a final answer in N/C. Is this right?
The electric force (measured in N) is ##\vec{F_{electric}}=q\vec{E}##, where ##\vec{E}## is the electric field, measured in N/C.
 
  • #19
I've done this exact style of question in my studies of physics, only my one involved a scalene triangle which brought some trig into the problem... It really helped me understand the properties of the electric vector field. Confused me quite a lot though.

But I grasped it after drawing vector diagrams for each charge and thinking about the vectors affecting each one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K