Electric Fields from Linear Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the necessary point charge at the origin to nullify the electric field at the center of a semi-circle of radius R, uniformly charged with total charge Q. The semi-circle is oriented such that its open end faces away from the origin, and the setup is symmetric about the x-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the electric field contributions from small charge elements into x and y components, questioning whether this is necessary given the symmetry of the problem. Some suggest that symmetry simplifies the calculations, while others emphasize the importance of including all components to avoid incorrect results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the necessity of including certain terms in the calculations, and there is acknowledgment of the role of symmetry in simplifying the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the relevance of integrating the y-component of the electric field, given that it sums to zero due to symmetry. Participants are also considering the implications of using polar coordinates for the calculations.

Mark Zhu
Messages
32
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Am amount of charge Q is uniformly spread over a semi-circle of radius R whose center is located a distance A from the origin. What point charge would have to be placed at the origin so that the E field at the center of the circle is 0? (The open end of the semi-circle is facing away from the origin, and is symmetric about the x axis).

Homework Equations


E = (k*q)/(r^2)
λ = Q/(pi*R)
λ = dq/ds
ds = R*dθ

The Attempt at a Solution


First we break up the entire line of charge into tiny bits of charge 'dq'. We look at a single 'dq' and consider the tiny charge's contribution to the electric field at point 'A' (the center of the semi-circle) in the x and y directions. We integrate 'dEx' and 'dEy' both with respect to 'θ' over the entire semi-circle of charge. Of course, we have to first do a series of substitutions for some of the variables using the above "relevant equations", before we can actually do the two integrations. Then we get 'Ex' and 'Ey', and all is well.

My question is since in this problem 'Ey' turns out to be zero due to symmetry, and so 'Ex' equals 'E', do we even need to break up 'dE' into its x and y components? If not, then in the integral of 'dEx' we could leave out the annoying 'sin θ' thus simplifying the calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark Zhu said:
My question is since in this problem 'Ey' turns out to be zero due to symmetry, and so 'Ex' equals 'E', do we even need to break up 'dE' into its x and y components? If not, then in the integral of 'dEx' we could leave out the annoying 'sin θ' thus simplifying the calculation.
You can invoke symmetry and that should be sufficient. However, you can also do the integral for Ey formally and verify that it is zero. Either way is correct.
 
Mark Zhu said:

Homework Statement


Am amount of charge Q is uniformly spread over a semi-circle of radius R whose center is located a distance A from the origin. What point charge would have to be placed at the origin so that the E field at the center of the circle is 0? (The open end of the semi-circle is facing away from the origin, and is symmetric about the x axis).

The Attempt at a Solution


...

My question is since in this problem 'Ey' turns out to be zero due to symmetry, and so 'Ex' equals 'E', do we even need to break up 'dE' into its x and y components? If not, then in the integral of 'dEx' we could leave out the annoying 'sin θ' thus simplifying the calculation.
You must include the "annoying" ##\sin\theta## to get ##E_x ~ .##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
tHANKS FOR THE HELPFUL POST!
 
You must include ##\sin\theta## to get the correct expression for ##E_x##. The correct contribution to ##E_x## from each dq includes the ##\sin\theta## term, otherwise you would integrating the wrong contribution from each dq and thus you would getting the wrong result for ##E_x##.

Because the contributions to ##E_y## sum up to zero due to symmetry, this doesn't give you the right "to transfer" the ##E_y## contributions to ##E_x## contributions and thus omit the ##\sin\theta## term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mark Zhu and SammyS
Thank you for all your great help guys, I understand it now.
 
oh
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
Tip: Doing this in polar coordinates should help. After you've cart bashed it, try by polars too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
956
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
10K