B Electric flux density and confusion about units

AI Thread Summary
Electric flux density is defined as electric flux per unit area, typically expressed in N/C, but it can also be represented using the formula D = εE, leading to the unit C/m². This creates confusion regarding the dimensional consistency between the two interpretations. The discussion clarifies that if D is termed as flux density, the corresponding flux is that of the displacement field, Φ_D = ∫ D·dS. It is also noted that Φ_D relates to the electric flux Φ_E through the equation Φ_D = εΦ_E. Understanding these relationships helps resolve the unit discrepancies.
sunil36
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My general understanding of electric flux density is 'electric flux per unit area'. This gives the SI unit N/C. But According the formula of electric flux density, D=eplison*E, the SI unit is C/m^2. How come the dimension in both cases not matching if both are true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's some terminological confusion. If you're planning on calling ##\vec D## the flux density then the corresponding flux is the flux of the displacement field, ##\Phi_D=\int \vec D\cdot d\vec S##. That's related to the flux we discussed in your other thread, ##\Phi_E=\int \vec E\cdot d\vec S##, as ##\Phi_D=\varepsilon \Phi_E##. I think that should sort out the units.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top