Electric flux through ends of an imaginary cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of electric flux through the ends of an imaginary cylinder, specifically considering the implications of the direction of the area vectors associated with the surfaces involved. The subject area is electric fields and flux, particularly in the context of symmetry and closed surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of choosing different directions for the area vectors on the calculation of electric flux, questioning the validity of obtaining multiple values. There is a focus on the conventions used for area vectors in relation to closed surfaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the signs and directions of area vectors. Some guidance has been provided regarding the convention for closed surfaces, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a diagram, which may affect the clarity of the problem setup. There is also mention of the possibility of treating the ends of the cylinder as part of a closed surface, which influences the direction of the area vectors.

vcsharp2003
Messages
913
Reaction score
179
Homework Statement
Imagine a cylinder that is symmetrical about an infinite plane sheet of charge as shown in the diagram. What is the electric flux through the ends ##A \text{ and } A^{'}## of this imaginary cylinder if ##\Delta {S}## is the area of each of these ends?
Relevant Equations
##\phi_E = \oint \vec E \cdot \vec {dS}##, which is the definition of electric flux
When I look at this question, I can see two possible values of electric flux depending on how I take the normal area vector for either ends ##A \text{ and } A^{'}##.
What is wrong with my logic below where I am ending up with two possible answers? The book mentions that only ##2E\Delta{S}## is correct.

We know that electric field will be the same at each and every point on ##A \text{ and } A^{'}##due to the symmetry of charge distribution on the plane sheet and it will always be perpendicular to ##A \text{ and } A^{'}##.

So, let's assume that this electric field at every point of these surfaces is E.
Now consider an infinitesimal area ##dS## on each of these surfaces.
Then electric flux through ##A## could be one of the two values since the normal area vector could be either towards the infinite plane sheet or away from the sheet: ##\phi_E = \oint \vec E \cdot \vec {dS} = \oint E dS \cos{0} \text{ , } \oint E {dS} \cos{2\pi} ##
So, electric flux through ##A## could be either ##E\Delta{S}## OR ##-E\Delta{S}##. The minus sign in second value is because ##\cos{2\pi} = -1##

From above it follows that electric flux through the ends ##A \text{ and } A^{'}## could be ##2E\Delta{S}## or ##0##. But the answer given is the first value and not the second value.

IMG_20210805_232848__01.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Don't see no diagram...
You sure you don' t have your signs mixed up?

## \ ##
 
BvU said:
Hi,

Don't see no diagram...
You sure you don' t have your signs mixed up?

## \ ##
Sorry, I was busy in correcting latex part of my question. I am about to upload the diagram in a minute.
 
BvU said:
You sure you don' t have your signs mixed up?
No, I don't think so. Based on which direction I take the area vector of ##A \text{ or } A^{'}##, I will get two different answers.
 
When calculating the flux through a closed surface, the direction of the area vector ##\vec{dS}## is always taken to be in the "outward" direction, i.e., away from the region enclosed by the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vcsharp2003
TSny said:
When calculating the flux through a closed surface, the direction of the area vector ##\vec{dS}## is always taken to be in the "outward" direction, i.e., away from the region enclosed by the surface.
I get that, but in this question the flux through the ends is being separately calculated. We could just as well have two circular surfaces ##A \text{ and } A^{'} ## rather than a cylinder.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
I get that, but in this question the flux through the ends is being separately calculated. We vould just as well have two circular surfaces A \text{ and } A^{'} rather than a cylinder.
OK. In that case, if you're allowed to choose the directions of the area vectors arbitrarily for the two ends of the cylinder, then there is not a definite answer. You could get answers of ##+2E\Delta S, -2E\Delta S## or ##0##. But then you might wonder why they even bother to mention the cylinder. They could have just given you the two circular areas.

The book's answer apparently corresponds to thinking of the two circular areas as part of a closed surface and therefore chooses the directions of the area vectors according to the convention for closed surfaces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vcsharp2003 and Orodruin
TSny said:
OK. In that case, if you're allowed to choose the directions of the arrow vectors arbitrarily for the two ends of the cylinder, then there is not a definite answer.
You're right. Since the diagram shows an imaginary cylinder so we need to consider it as a closed surface and then what you say about area vector pointing away from the closed surface makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K