Electric Grounding: What Does it Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harshant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Ground
AI Thread Summary
Grounding refers to establishing a zero potential reference point, often using the Earth due to its vast size and stability in electron exchange. In practical applications, maintaining a conductor at zero potential involves creating a low impedance connection to the Earth, which can be complex depending on soil conditions. While the concept of an infinite conducting plane suggests zero energy is needed to move a charge to it, using Earth as a reference is more practical for electrical systems. The choice of reference point for potential differences is arbitrary, but Earth is commonly used for convenience. Understanding grounding is essential for effective electrical circuit design and safety.
harshant
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I was going through the method of image charges and came up with this "infinite grounded conducting plane". What i wanted to ask is that in reality how do you actually maintain a conductor at zero potential w.r.t. infinity? What does "grounding" mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Grounding" just means that the potential is zero.
Since ilt is a conductor, if any part of it is atg zero potential, then all of it is as far as the eye can see, which is a definition of infinity.
 
But how do you maintain zero potential w.r.t infinity in real situations? How does connecting the conductor to earth/ground make the potential zero?
 
There is a difference between ground and earth. If you have a battery driven circuit you can still define a potential V=0, i.e. ground. The reason is that only differences in potential matter; meaning where you decide to put the zero has no physical significance.

Now, Earth is another matter. There are several reasons why we often connect ground to earth. One is simply that mains wiring uses the potential of Earth (i.e. literally the globe) as zero which means that most electrical equipment does so too. The same is true for e.g. radio transmitters.
One advantage with the Earth is that it is pretty big meaning it doesn't really matter if you add or remove a few electrons to it; i.e. it won't get "charged" no matter what.

Getting a good low impedance connection to Earth is actually quite tricky; a lightning rod is of course the simplest example (i.e. a metal rod hammered into the ground) but sometimes more sophisticated methods are neccesary. If the soil is very dry it might be neccesary to bury a rather large chunk of metal in order to get a large enough contact area. In some cases salt is added to the soil in order to increase the conductivity.
 
In addition to potential difference, one can also define an absolute potential, which is the potential w.r.t. infinity. In other words, we can define an absolute voltage based on the energy it takes to move a test charge from infinity to the point of interest.

For the problem of an infinite conducting sheet, it actually takes ZERO energy to move a test charge from infinity to any point on the sheet (by the definition of a perfectly conducting sheet). So the sheet in this case is in some sense "grounded" at infinity.

As f95toli pointed out though, the use of infinity as a reference point is no more significant that using the potential of the Earth, or any other potential for that matter. That is why, rather than bothering to try to set voltages w.r.t. infinity, we choose a common reference point that is most convenient to us, which is typically Earth.

Claude.
 
I think i got it, thanks guys!
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top