What is the role of free electrons in electric induction?

AI Thread Summary
Free electrons in a conductor move to the surface until electrostatic equilibrium is reached, resulting in a surface charge density while the interior remains charge-free. In electrostatic conditions, the electric field inside the conductor is zero, leading to a charge density of zero within the volume, as described by Gauss's law. However, a surface charge density exists due to the discontinuity in the electric field at the conductor's surface when transitioning from the interior to the exterior. The discussion raises questions about the reasons behind the surface charge distribution and the implications of potential application on the conductor's electron density. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the principles of electric induction in conductors.
Omega0
Messages
215
Reaction score
52
Hi,

I have been told that you take say a metal board and another board (both endless and paralell)
leads to the following effect:

The electrons are more or less freel in motion, they move to the surface until we reach an equilibrium. The electrons are assembled at the surface. Nice.

Next lesson: Internally there is no electrical field. It holds:

div(rho)=0 because rho is 0.

Okay, rho is zero when the electrons are missing at the other side of the board...
This counts only for the volume but not the surface!?

Do I get something trivial wrong or is there a deeper reason?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given an arbitrary conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, ##\rho = 0## in the material of the conductor because ##\vec{E} = 0## in the material of the conductor and from Gauss's law we then have ##\vec{\nabla}\cdot \vec{E} = 0 = 4\pi \rho##. But of course there is charge density on the surface of the conductor as you yourself noted; the surface charge density ##\sigma## is given by the jump condition in the electric field when passing from the interior of the conductor to the exterior: ##\hat{n}\cdot (\vec{E}_2 - \vec{E}_1) = 4\pi \sigma## or equivalently ##\hat{n}\cdot (\vec{\nabla}\varphi_2 - \vec{\nabla}\varphi_1) = -4\pi \sigma## where ##\vec{E}_2## is the exterior electric field, ##\vec{E}_1## is the interior electric field, and ##\hat{n}## is the unit normal to the surface of the conductor. This is assuming there are no dielectric materials present (the modification to the jump condition in the presence of dielectrics is very straightforward anyways). This is all in Gaussian units by the way.
 
Thanks, but this is exactly what I read in every book. You say "surface charge density is given by the jump condition in the electric field when passing from the interior of the conductor to the exterior" but why?
Take the not influenced object as electrically neutral. div(rho)=0 naturally holds. Apply a potential, you learn
that the jump conditions hold. Jumps are something where you mathematically should be alarmed.
But okay, it's fine if you accept that the distribution of the electrons is suddenly on the surface.

My question is: Why?
What about the other side?

There is another reason which is not explained in detail. Could you give me a curve describing the electron density in this conductur?
 
Why what? Why all the charges are on the surface of the conductor after reaching electrostatic equilibrium?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top