Electric Potential Energy Concept

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is confirmed as a scalar quantity since it lacks direction. It is possible to assign a value of zero to electric potential at the origin, as potential is relative to a reference point. The change in a particle's potential energy is indeed dependent on the path length between two points, consistent with the equation U = qV. The work required to move a charge from potential Vi to Vf is accurately represented as q(Vf - Vi), as this reflects the work done against the electric force. Overall, the points discussed are validated, with emphasis on the importance of reference points in electric potential.
r0306
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm unsure if the following is true or not in the absence of external forces:
  • Electric potential is a scalar quantity.
This I know is true because there is no direction associated with potential energy.
  • It is always possible to assign a value of zero to the electric potential at the origin.
This I am completely unsure of though I think it is true because potential depends on a reference point that you can set yourself.
  • The change in a particle's potential energy depends on the total length of its path between two points.
I suspect that this is true because U = qV and V is dependent on the distance between the points.
  • The work required to move a charge q from a point at potential Vi to a point at potential Vf is q(Vf - Vi).
This should be false because (delta)U = q(Vf - Vi) and W = -(delta)U so it should be -q(Vf - Vi) instead.

Can someone please verify my reasoning and correct me if I'm wrong? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
q(Vf - Vi) is correct for the work done by the force opposing the electric force. If the work done by electric field was being considered, it would be q(Vi - Vf).
 
TESL@ said:
q(Vf - Vi) is correct for the work done by the force opposing the electric force. If the work done by electric field was being considered, it would be q(Vi - Vf).
That means all of the points listed are true then? I'm really uncertain about the second point.
 
Your second point is true as long as you offset the potentials of all the charges in the system wrt. the ground you take.
 
what did u end up getting for this?
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top