Electrical potential and potential difference

AI Thread Summary
Electrical potential difference (p.d.) is defined as the work done to move a unit charge between two points in a circuit, expressed as V=W/Q. The discussion raises a question about whether p.d. should vary based on the distance between points, as work done is proportional to distance. In many steady-state DC circuits, however, p.d. remains largely independent of distance due to the conservative nature of electric fields. For example, in a large sphere connected to a battery, the p.d. between any two points on the sphere is determined solely by their positions, not the path taken. This is supported by the gradient theorem, which states that work in a conservative field depends only on the endpoints, not the trajectory.
ajay.05
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
Indian school books say -- We define the electrical p.d. between two points in an electrical circuit carrying some current as the work done to move a unit charge from one point to other!
=>V=W/Q

But, my doubt is...since work done is directly proportional to distance between two points, shouldn't the p.d. change from point to point(depending on their distances)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, the potential difference depends on the geometry of the problem, which includes distances between points. But in a large number of problems, which includes steady-state DC circuits, the p.d. is independent of that, or the dependence is negligible.

Take, for example, a large sphere that is connected to a pole of a battery. Each point of the sphere will have a p.d. with the other pole of the battery. But what is the p.d. between any two poles on the sphere?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
For a conservative electric field (and for all practical purposes the electric field in circuit theory is considered to be conservative) the work of the electric field between two points depends only on which are those two points and not in the trajectory we choose between those two points.

That is because since the field is conservative then E=\nabla \phi(r) and since the work between two points is defined as the integral W=\int_{\gamma(p,q)}{E(r)dr} (where \gamma(p,q) is any curve between the two points p and q) which integral W by the gradient theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem depends only on the value of the function \phi(r) at the points p and q.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top