Electrodynamics: quaternionic potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of unifying electromagnetic potentials, specifically the scalar potential (Φ) and vector potential (A), into a quaternionic potential. It suggests that each quaternion can represent both a scalar and a vector component, potentially simplifying the formulation of electromagnetic fields. The conversation highlights that the potentials can also be viewed as components of a four-vector, Aμ, which relates to Maxwell's equations through the equation ∂²Aμ = jμ/ε₀. This approach indicates that complex quaternions can express four-vectors as sums of scalars and 3-vectors. The idea of quaternionic potentials presents a novel perspective on electromagnetic theory.
the_viewer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!

It's possible to construct a electromagnetic field, such that
\vec{F}:=\vec{E} + i\cdot \vec{B}.
Now the real part is the electric and the imaginary part is the magnetic field.
Then, for example, the maxwell equations take the form
\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \rho, \qquad \rho \in \mathbb{R}
and
\nabla\times \vec{F} - i \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \vec{F} = \vec{j}, \qquad \vec{j} \in \mathbb{R}^3
So, it is possible to combine electric and magnetic field into one (complex) Field.

Now my question: Is something similar possible for the electromagnetic potentials \Phi and \vec{A}?
My idea is to combine the scalar and vector potential into one quaternionic potential.
(Each quaternion consists of an scalar part and an vector part, so somehow it seems possible...)
If possible: How do the field equations look like with such an potential?
Or is there a different possibility to "unify" these two potentials?

Thanks,

David
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
the_viewer said:
Hi!

Now my question: Is something similar possible for the electromagnetic potentials \Phi and \vec{A}?
My idea is to combine the scalar and vector potential into one quaternionic potential.
(Each quaternion consists of an scalar part and an vector part, so somehow it seems possible...)
If possible: How do the field equations look like with such an potential?
Or is there a different possibility to "unify" these two potentials?

Thanks,

David

The potentials \varphi and (A_x, A_y, A_z) are actually the components of a single four-vector A_{\mu} = (\varphi, A_x, A_y, A_z). This is called the four-potential. In terms of the four potential, maxwell's equations can be written (with an appropriate choice of gauge) as

\partial^2 A_{\mu} = j_{\mu} / \epsilon_{0}​

Where j_{\mu} = (\rho, j_x, j_y, j_z) is the four-current.
 
dx said:
The potentials \varphi and (A_x, A_y, A_z) are actually the components of a single four-vector A_{\mu} = (\varphi, A_x, A_y, A_z).

And, in the system of complex quaternions, 4-vectors are expressed as (direct) sums of scalars plus 3-vectors.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top