Electromagnetic damping and conductivity of metals

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the conductivity of various metals and the rate of change in gravitational potential energy when subjected to an electromagnetic field. Data from an eddy current experiment reveals that conductivity varies significantly among metals, with copper showing the highest conductivity and energy dissipation rate. Participants seek an equation that links conductivity to energy dissipation, suggesting an exponential relationship. It is noted that conductivity is a material property while potential energy is an object property, indicating that comparisons should consider uniform object dimensions and movement speed. The conversation highlights the complexity of electromagnetic phenomena, including the influence of microscopic effects like friction.
maltesers
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The following data shows the conductivity of 5 metals and the rate of change in gravitational potential energy due to induced current when the metal is passed through a electromagnetic field of 5.4mT on the end of a pendulum. you know, the classic eddy current experiment.
I'm just wondering if anyone knew an equation linking the conductivity and rate of energy disipation? It looks like an exponential relationship to me. Anyone know exactly what it is? Would be really helpful! cheers

Material Rate of change in Gravitational conductivity
potential energy(10^-4J/s) (10^6 siemens/m)

Steel 3.53 1.5
Nickel silver 3.62 3.5
Zinc 3.71 17
Aluminium 4.47 35
Copper 8.46 58
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry that table didnt come out properly
 
conductivity is a MATERIAL property, while PE is an OBJECT property.
IF each material was made into an object of the same dimensions (l,w,h)
AND were moved through the magnet at the same speed,
THEN then power dissipated by macroscopic electromagnetic phenomena
should be proportional to (magnetic mu)^2 (electrical conductivity).

I'd guess your data includes a lot of microscopic EM phenomena (friction).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top