Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted By An Accelerating Charge

AI Thread Summary
An oscillating point charge emits electromagnetic radiation, even at low frequencies, but the energy decreases with frequency, making detection challenging due to noise levels. The time-varying field of the charge is described by the Lienard-Wiechert potentials. The discussion highlights the distinction between near and far fields, with the near field characterized by terms that decay faster than r^-1. Clarification on these terms and their significance is sought, particularly in relation to their mathematical representation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the behavior of electromagnetic fields from moving charges.
TheWiseFool
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose a point charge is slowly oscillating simple harmonically. Does it emit an electromagnet wave and if not why not ? How does its field change with time. Does anyone know of a good animation ?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to PF.
However "s..l..o..w..l..y" the charge oscillates, it will radiate a very low frequency wave.
There is a practical limit to what can actually be measured, however. The Energy of the oscillation gets lower as the frequency is reduced so, in the end, you just can't detect it; it will be below the noise level in any experiment.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
TheWiseFool said:
How does its field change with time.
The field from an arbitrarily moving point charge is given by the Lienard Wiechert potentials.
 
Thank you both. My intuition was confirmed.
So, this has nothing to do with 'near' and 'far' fields. I have not yet seen a clear, explanation of these terms and their significance. Would anyone like to try? Responses much appreciated.
 
TheWiseFool said:
I have not yet seen a clear, explanation of these terms and their significance. Would anyone like to try
If you look at the Lienard Wiechert formulas (the fields, not the potentials) you will see that there are a couple of terms one term is proportional to ##r^{-1}## and one proportional to ##r^{-2}##. The former is the far field and the latter is the near field. More generally, any field term that falls off faster than ##r^{-1}## is considered part of the near field.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top