Electromagnetic wave energy density

AI Thread Summary
An electromagnetic plane wave consists of electric and magnetic fields that contribute equally to its energy density, a fact supported by mathematical principles. The discussion centers on the fundamental reasons behind this exact symmetry, particularly in the absence of electric charges, as described by Maxwell's equations. While the mathematical framework is clear, the inquiry delves into the philosophical aspect of why such symmetry exists in physics. It is noted that physics can describe observed symmetries but may not provide a deeper explanation for their existence. Ultimately, the conversation suggests that alternative theories could exist, but they would not align with current observations.
Plane Wave
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
An electromagnetic plane wave has an electric field and a magnetic field. Each component contributes equally to the energy density. Mathematically it is very straight forward to show this is true.

The question is, "Fundamentally, why is this true?" Again, I'm not looking for a derivation. There are no issues with the math, just interpreting the physics from the math. With such a beautiful symmetry there must be a fundamental reason why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without eletric charges, there is an exact symmetry between electric and magnetic fields (check Maxwell's equations in gaussian units with ρ=0 and j=0). There is no way to make the contributions different.
 
As I said, I can do the math.

The question is why is there an exact symmetry.

Is your answer that there is simply no reason for there not to be an exact symmetry?
 
Physics is not about "why". We observe a symmetry, physics can describe this symmetry. But physics cannot explain why our laws of physics are that way.

I am sure you could develop some alternative theory without that symmetry. It would have to look different, and it disagrees with observations, but it would be a possible theory for other/alternative universes (if they exist) or whatever.
 
Take a standing wave, small enough: at some times it contains only electrical energy and at other times only magnetic energy, so both are equal.

A propagating wave is a sum of two standing waves.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top