Electromagnetics question for physicists/engineers

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjb23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the principles of electromagnet design, specifically the equations for magnetic flux density and total magnetic flux in a solenoid. The user is puzzled by the relationship between cross-sectional area and flux density, noting that increasing the diameter of the core does not seem to reduce flux density as expected. They acknowledge that while coil length increases with diameter, the flux density remains constant at the core's surface, leading to confusion. Suggestions include conducting experiments to observe the magnetic field strength in relation to cross-sectional area and considering the derivations already done. Ultimately, the user contemplates the oddities of these relationships as a potential topic for further research.
jjb23
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've been looking into electromagnet design and there is a certain principle/set of equations that are bothering me...

(1) B = (kμ0Ni)/L

(2) ø = BA

Where;
- ø = total magnetic flux (wb)
- B = magnetic flux density (wb/m2)

I am trying to solve for an optimum cross sectional area of core material in a solenoid, however according to these equations flux density (field strength) is not proportional to cross sectional area. So in theory you could keep increasing the diameter of your core material to increase the total flux with all other variables staying constant.

I would have thought that total flux was a conserved quantity with flux density reducing with increased area. This does not seem to be the case, and makes little sense.

As a physical analogy, it seems like having a material of constant density and increasing the volume to increase the mass... breaking every rule in the book!


I may well be missing something somewhere along the way, if you could advise as to a solution to my cross sectional 'core area' problem that'd be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you increase the crossectional area, you are increasing the length of wire in each loop too - giving more moving charges surrounding the area.

[edit] sorry, had to step out for a bit... to continue.
I realize that the circumference increases as L while area increases as L^2 - so including that idea into the argument suggests that flux density should depend (inversely) on the radius of the loops - which is what happens for a single loop.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html
... getting closer. Extend that line of thinking for a large number of loops ... the flux density will have an extra contribution from the number of loops - adding in an extra length dimension in the numerator.

To really see what's going on, you need to do the derivation.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/solenoid.html
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply.

I've already considered how coil length would increase with increased core diameter, but this only means that the flux density will remain constant at the surface of the core regardless of diameter. I have also done the derivations (several times!) and it still seems odd to me.

Anyone got any suggestions/equations for core area?
 
Well if it still seems odd after doing the maths, and after building one and measuring, then there is nothing we can do. You will just have to accept that it is odd.
 
Perhaps some trail and error will yield some relationships. It does seem a bit of a grey area; I may have just found myself a topic for my research paper, cheers.
 
You already have the relationships - you just find them odd.
But if you have not done any experiments on this before, you should certainly do them.
See if the magnetic field strength in the center of the solenoid (what the formula is for remember) depends on it's crossection area.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top