Electromagnetics - Telegraphers EQs - 3 parallel lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a multisection transmission line problem involving three lossless lines connecting a 5V source to two 66Ω loads. Key formulas for reflection coefficients and characteristic impedance are utilized to analyze the system. The user successfully calculates the necessary variables but encounters confusion regarding a specific voltage bounce of 0.2V in the bounce diagram. They trace the origins of other voltages but cannot account for this 0.2V, leading to uncertainty about the accuracy of the diagram. The user plans to seek clarification from a teaching assistant.
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A multisection transmission line consists of three lossless transmission lines used to connect an ideal step source of 5V amplitude and 6\Omega output impedance to two separate load resistances of 66\Omega each. All three lines are characterized by the line parameters L = 364.5 nH/m and C = 125 pF/m and length of 40cm. Sketch voltages Vs and V_L versus t for 0 < t < 20 ns.

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5678/problem218lq7.jpg


Homework Equations



\Gamma_S\,=\,\frac{R_S\,-\,Z_0}{R_S\,+\,Z_0}

\Gamma_L\,=\,\frac{R_L\,-\,Z_0}{R_L\,+\,Z_0}

Z_0\,=\,\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}

v_p\,=\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{L\,C}}

t_d\,=\,\frac{l}{v_p}


The Attempt at a Solution



http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/8978/problem218solnpu5.jpg

I found all the variables quite easily using the formulas above. I started making the bounce diagram and got a few t_d into it. But when I get to 3t_d=8.1 ns, I am confused by one of the bounced voltages. I have the answer, but I have no idea where the writers are getting a 0.2V bounce in the diagram.

On the right side, between 8.1ns < t < 10.8ns, there are three voltages. 0.8V, -0.1V and the mysterious 0.2V. I understand that the 0.8V line comes from the 1.2V on the left, and the -0.1V line comes from the reflection of the 0.3V line above. Actually there should be two of the 0.1V lines considering the reflection from both of the right hand lines. But where is that third 0.2V line coming from?

Please help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The bounce diagram is wrong? I really can't think of any other explanation. I will ask TA tomorrow I guess!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Back
Top