Electromagnets and Permanent Magnets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the construction and measurement of electromagnets and permanent magnets, particularly in the context of a group project involving balancing a weight using these magnets. Participants explore the properties of different core materials and methods for quantifying magnetic strength.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to quantify the strength of a cylindrical permanent magnet and asks for guidance on constructing electromagnets.
  • Another participant suggests using formulas for magnetic induction (B) to quantify the strength of permanent magnets and provides general advice on constructing electromagnets, emphasizing the importance of the core material.
  • There is a discussion about the trade-offs between using different core materials, such as iron cores for strong fields versus specialized cores with lower residual fields.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about measuring the magnetic field of an electromagnet and plans to consult a physics lecturer for further clarification.
  • Questions arise regarding the use of soft iron cores, including their remanence, permeability, and the potential issue of eddy currents, with a request for recommendations on core materials.
  • Another participant inquires whether the soft iron core should be a solid piece or laminated, and how using a DC supply might affect hysteresis and eddy currents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the best core material or construction method for the electromagnet, and there are multiple competing views regarding the effects of different materials and configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific current levels that will be used in the electromagnet, which may affect the discussion on eddy currents and hysteresis. There are also unresolved questions about the optimal core design and its implications for performance.

Klepht
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Im an engineering student currently working on a group project. Part of the project is to use a electric magnet and a permanent magnet to balance a weight on the end of a cantilever (digital scale effectively). We would then measure the current through the electromagnet to calculate the weight.

My question is (since I only did physics in first year) how can I quantify the strength of my permanent magnet (cylindrical, 1cm high, 2 cm diameter roughly)

and secondly could someone point me in the right direction for constructing electromagnets?

Thanks very much :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Klepht

Look at this site for basic ideas on magnetism, starting with the solenoid
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/solenoid.html

The formulas for computing the field strength of permanent magnets (essentially the magnetic induction B) should be available online - just google it out (am a bit lazy right now). But you would quantify the strength of electromagnets using it's magnetic induction (B) value. Usually this tends to be of the order of a few teslas for strong electromagnets. 1T=10,000 Gauss.

Your typical electromagnets on the other hand, aren't going to give you as strong a field - at least not for very long. These are very simple to make - just keep winding the core with several hundred turns of wire. And that's the key - the core. Using an air-core (i.e. just a magnet wire wound in a tight helical fashion), you're not going to get much strength. For your application, I presume you'd need a much stronger field - maybe a 0.5-several teslas. This is going to take quite some work unless you use strong cores.

If residual fields are fine (go for an iron core, or variations of the iron core). These have the advantage of producing very strong fields, but tend to stay magnetized for quite a long time after the current is turned off (unless you switch current directions and demagnetize them). If residual fields aren't fine, go for more specialized cores (like powdered ferrite core, MPP, High-Flux, etc). These tend to have significantly smaller residual fields, aren't too expensive, but tend to produce weaker fields.

So, if you take an iron core, you need lesser turns since the permeability of the core is pretty darn high. Since time isn't a critical issue for your project (if millisecond to second times don't matter much), go for something like this.

Also, note that if you pass too much current, you're going to heat your magnet a lot. So, unless you're modelling the whole thing and making an advanced control setup that takes heating into account, I would recommend just getting better cores, and reducing the current you need.

Good luck!
 
Thanks for the reply rsr_life

I couldn't find anything on how to compute/measure the magnetic field of an electromagent but I am going to go find a physics lecturerer today and see what he/she has to say on hte matter.

I haven't decided on the core yet but since the electromagnet only has to balance a wieght of 1 kg maximum I suspect we'll go for a core that suffers from very little residual field. Would be fun setting up an advanced control loop to set the field back to 0 everytime and actually may not be that difficult. Will invetigate.
 
This is a question relating to the construction of the electromeagnet spcifically the core:

Ive read that using a 'soft' iron core has low remnance, high permeativity and is relatively inexpensive. Can anyone recommend a different core material or possibly comment on the use of the soft iron core? How much of a problem will eddy currents be? I have no clue what amount of current Ill be passing through the windings. Will have to be able to life 1kg so approx 10 Newtons max but there is a permanent magnet to aid with lifting.

Also would the soft iron core be a lump of metal or would it have to be laminated?

I'm using a DC supply so what effect does that have on hysteresis, eddy current etc...

Thanks everyone
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K