Electromotive force in a moving bar

AI Thread Summary
A moving conducting bar in a uniform magnetic field generates an electromotive force (emf) due to the Lorentz force acting on charge carriers within the bar. The emf is calculated using the formula emf = L*v*B, where L is the length of the bar, v is its velocity, and B is the magnetic field strength. When connected in a closed circuit, this setup can produce current flow, but the constant magnetic flux through the circuit suggests no emf should be present according to Faraday's law. However, the discussion clarifies that while one bar develops emf, the opposite bar in a closed loop creates an equal and opposite emf, resulting in no net current flow. The scenario illustrates the complexities of electromagnetic induction in moving systems.
shaiyefet
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I've seen in some lecture notes that a moving conducting bar (length of L) in a uniform and constant magnetic field develops an electromotive force (emf) between the 2 edges of the bar.

Lets assume that the bar moves to the right (with velocity v) and the magnetic field (B) points into the screen.

So the explanation I've seen is that the magnetic field applies force on positive charges towards one side of the bar and negative charges towards the other side.
The system comes to a steady state when the emf between the 2 edges of the bar is:
emf=L*v*B

So as long as the bar is moving there is emf.
So the bar is now like a battery, and if we'll connect a wire between the 2 edges of the bar to create a closed circuit then we'll have current flowing in the loop.

But since the magnetic field is constant and uniform and the circuit area does not change, then according to Faraday's law, the magnetic flux through the circuit area is constant, so there should be no emf...

Can anybody help me solve this??

Thanks a lot!
Shai
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make the loop square - there will be EMF in one "bar" of the loop - what about the opposite bar?
 
Yeah I see now,
So you mean that the opposite bar will develop the same emf, and will be considered as a second battery, so the 2 batteries facing each other, so no current will flow, right?

Please confirm just to be sure...
Thanks a lot...
 
Yep - by the "generating emf" description.
There's a bunch of puzzles like this... you can do it by rotating the loop so half moves one way and the other half moves the opposite way.
 
If the bar is resting on rails and the rails are connected by a fixed connector then a current will flow from the moving wire as it is pulled, along the rails, to the right.
If the field is into the screen as you quote then the top end of the moving wire will be +ve and the bottom end will be -ve
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top