What is the definition of electron affinity in solids?

Borek
Mentor
Messages
29,132
Reaction score
4,556
I was always under impression that electron affinity is defined (and listed in tables), as energy change when isolated atom in gaseous phase gains an electron.

However, I was lately told that the same term is used for solids in "standard semiconductors references", like in Sze's Physics of semiconductor devices. Obviously that would mean quite different thing and can be confusing at first.

Unfortunately I don't have access to any books to check if that's the case. Anyone can confirm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "electron affinity" of a neutral species X is defined as the energy of X anion minus X neutral. It works for atoms, molecules, and solids (large molecules in some sense...).

Molecules have the special characteristic of having distinct vertical and adiabatic electron affinities (for the adiabatic EA, the molecular geometry of the anion is relaxed, for the vertical the geometry of the neutral is taken). Solids have the special characteristic that ionization potential and electron affinity are closely related to electronic excitation energies, because the holes and particles of excitations can spatially separate and act like screened local cations/anions without influencing each other.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top