Why is the Electron Self-Energy Important in QFT Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
In QTF theory book of Peskin&Schroder they say:Call 1PI the one particle irreducible diagram,so Fourier two-point correlation function can write:
i/(gamma(vector).p-m0) +i/(gamma.p-m0)(1PI/(gamma.p-m0) +i/(gamma.p-m0)square(1PI/(gamma.p-m0))...=i/(gamma.p-m0-1PI).
They say that we can sum the left hand side to have the right hand side because the left is a geometric serie.But I don't understand why we can sum while we don't know 1PI/(gamma.p-m0) being smaller than 1 or not.Another worrying is that the calculation is done before the making renormalization and QED being asymtotic theory.
Thank you very much in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Please teach me this:
In QFT theory book of Peskin&Schroder they say:Call 1PI the one particle irreducible diagram,so Fourier two-point correlation function can write:
i/(gamma(vector).p-m0) +i/(gamma.p-m0)(1PI/(gamma.p-m0) +i/(gamma.p-m0)square(1PI/(gamma.p-m0))...=i/(gamma.p-m0-1PI).
They say that we can sum the left hand side to have the right hand side because the left is a geometric series. But I don't understand why we can sum while we don't know 1PI/(gamma.p-m0) being smaller than 1 or not.Another worrying is that the calculation is done before the making renormalization and QED being asymptotic theory.

Using 1+z+...+z^n+... = 1/(1-z) without bothering about convergence is called formal manipulation. Note that the formula is valid in the field of formal power series in z. Quantum field theory is full of such formal manipulations. After sufficiently skilful such manipulations and approximations one usually arrives at something (called ''renormalized'') where one can insert a particular value of z and get meaningful results. This can be justified in many cases by means of expansions of analytic functions, so one hopes that it also gives valid results when such justifications are too hard to come by (as in QED).
The proof is then by comparison with experiment rather than by rigorous mathematics.
 
I am profound grateful the kind helping of Prf.A Neumaier
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top