Electron transmission naming conventions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the confusion surrounding the naming conventions for electron transitions, specifically the difference between capital letters (like K-alpha) and lowercase (like Lyman alpha). It highlights the lack of a comprehensive table that correlates these naming conventions with the corresponding series such as Lyman, Balmer, and Paschen. The question also seeks clarity on the relationship between the energy of an electron and the maximum atomic number Z for which K-alpha lines can be produced in x-ray spectra. The need for a standardized naming system is emphasized, as the current inconsistency complicates understanding for students. Lastly, the discussion requests a formula to determine the maximum atomic number based on an electron's energy of 25keV.
Andrusko
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I know you can name transitions between states like Lyman alpha, beta, gamma and whatnot but every time I see them they are written with a capital letter instead like K-alpha, beta, gamma.

I cannot actually find a table anywhere (yes I have googled) that sums up how the two naming conventions are relative to one another, except that K-alpha means transition from n=2 to n=1.

The alpha, beta, gamma bit means from one, two, three level(s) up relative to the level you're at, right?

But in this particular naming convention what capital letters correspond to Lyman, Balmer, Paschen series etc.?

Sorry if it is a confusing question I am just very frustrated and having trouble putting my question into words properly. And why the hell isn't this a standardized naming system? It just confuses poor stupid physics students like me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Furthermore, could someone please tell me which equation I would use to answer this question:

An electron is fired at a target with 25keV of energy.
What is the maximum atomic number Z of a target metal for which the x-ray spectrum will include the K-alpha spectrum line?

I can't find a formula anywhere that has anything to do with atomic numbers and energy levels.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top