Electronics: using water pressure & flow analogy to explain voltage & current

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of using the water pressure and flow analogy to explain the concepts of voltage and current in electronics. Participants share their experiences and perspectives on whether this analogy aids in understanding these fundamental concepts, particularly for novices in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the water analogy, noting that novices rarely respond positively to it and suggesting it may not be beneficial for teaching voltage and current.
  • Another participant finds the analogy to be useless, indicating a strong disagreement with its effectiveness.
  • A different participant recounts a personal positive experience with the analogy, describing it as a significant "AHA!" moment, although they later had to relearn the concepts in more depth.
  • One participant emphasizes the complexity of understanding current and voltage, stating that the analogy did not help them during their initial learning phase.
  • Another participant argues that the water analogy can be very useful if presented carefully, highlighting the importance of acknowledging its limitations and the gradual nature of understanding these concepts.
  • A participant mentions a preference for using a gravity and ping pong ball analogy after briefly using the water analogy, suggesting that it may lead to a better understanding of the physical situation involving electrons.
  • One participant reflects on the necessity of understanding potential energy to grasp voltage, suggesting that traditional physics approaches may be more effective for some learners.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the usefulness of the water analogy, with some finding it beneficial and others dismissing it as ineffective. There is no consensus on its overall value in teaching voltage and current.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that understanding these concepts can take time and may depend on individual learning styles. The discussion highlights the limitations of analogies in fully capturing the complexities of electrical concepts.

Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
12,179
Reaction score
186
Electronics / electrical engineering forums often get questions from novices who have trouble understanding the concepts of voltage and current. Invariably, a more knowledgeable person will explain it by giving the standard analogy between electricity and water:

voltage <--> water pressure
current <--> water flow rate (eg. liters/sec of water)

I'm interested in people's thoughts on whether this analogy actually gets the concept across to the novice?

While the analogy works in principle, I have never seen a novice person respond with "Aha, thanks, I get it now. That water analogy makes total sense to me". After more than 3 years participating in the usenet group sci.electronics.basics, and several months here at PF, I have yet to see that sort of response from the many novices who have had this fundamental misunderstanding.

So, I am highly suspicious that this electronics<-->water analogy, while true, is not beneficial in terms of teaching beginners about voltage and current. What do others think?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's useless.
 
I was taught this analogy as a teen and it was a huge "AHA!" moment for me. It was useful.

Of course I had to relearn it all over again when I got to upper division E&M.
 
I think it is a very hard concept to understand and it can take years to fully understand current/voltage. There are too many "why?".

This analogy never helped. I just struggled with these concepts for some several months ... Now, after finishing first year of EE, I have some basic knowledge about current and voltage but still not sufficient.
 
It is not useless. It is very useful. I have had many students who "get it" completely when I use the water analogy. I am careful, however, to add a caveat (repeatedly) that it is an analogy, which means that it is not "it" exactly, and understanding it fully is something you "get" after a long time of pondering and taking in more information from further studies. Sometimes I'll remind students that no one ever "fully" understands anything. All we can do is get a little closer to building a mental model that "works," which means something that allows us to correctly predict an outcome of any given circumstance ("look at the computer screen and tell me if someone predicted these electric circuits correctly").

The concept of electric potential is often the hardest to understand, so calling it "sort of like an electric pressure" is the closest to "not wrong" that any analogy can get. With current, I have to be careful to make sure that it is not equivalent to net speed (so electric current is not the same as watter current) but the net quantity f electrons going by. I use a "wide river vs. garden hose" analogy for this one.

If it is carefully presented, with full discloser about the ultimate failure of all analogies, the water analogy is the best method for learning to distinguish between current, voltage, and resistance.
 
Here is a PF thread where we debated the usefulness of the water analogy:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=124517

Using it for a brief analogy is okay, IMO, but its usefulness is very limited past that, again IMO.

After using the water analogy briefly, I prefer to then use more of a gravity and ping pong ball analogy, to get the student thinking more in terms closer to the real physical situation (discrete electrons moving in the conductor lattice). I like to picture something like a lifting conveyor belt for the balls to represent the battery, and a vertical pipe with stationary obstructions (similar to a pachinko machine) as the resistive wires and devices. The balls fall at a rate determined by the rate of collisions with the stationary lattice, analogous to I = V/R.
 
Thanks to everyone for the responses, and to berkeman for posting the link to the past PF thread.

My thinking is that students really have to understand the concept of potential energy in order to understand voltage. Usually in physics books electricity is introduced with Coulomb's law, giving the force between two point charges. People seem to have no trouble with the concept of electric charge, and are quite familiar with forces at this point in their studies. Over the course of several chapters, force is used to explain electric field, which in turn is used to explain electric potential (i.e. voltage). This all takes some time, but perhaps in the end is the best way for many to grasp it.

I appreciate that the water analogy (and others) have helped some people. It's been so long ago that I learned this stuff myself I'm not quite sure just how the understanding came about, but I know it wasn't the analogy route.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
12K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
15K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K