Electronmagnetic signals and properties

AI Thread Summary
Factors determining whether electromagnetic signals can be used for broadcasting versus point-to-point communication include frequency, energy absorption, and antenna design. Higher frequency signals, such as microwaves, often require line-of-sight due to increased absorption rates, making them suitable for narrow beamwidth point-to-point links. Infrared signals, despite having higher frequencies, are limited to point-to-point communication as they cannot penetrate walls. Broadcasting can occur at lower frequencies, such as those used in terrestrial TV and FM radio, which operate below 2 GHz. Ultimately, the distinction between broadcasting and point-to-point communication is flexible and largely depends on the antenna configuration and application.
medwatt
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I want to know what factors determine that a signal (radio wave, microwave, infra red) cannot be use for broadcasting but only point to point communication. I know that it has to do with frequency and the energy associated with it but cannot seem to have a concrete reason because of those in the microwave range.
For example I know that infra red which has highest frequency of the other two mentioned is only utilised in point to point communication as they cannot pass through walls and so it cannot be transmitted uni directionally.
Microwaves which start from 2 GHz can sometimes be used for broadcasting as in the case of FM or Television where the signals can penetrate through walls and at the same time for point to point between communication towers. Why then when considering the ku band ground station antennas send microwave signals to satellites which are in geostationary orbit using point to point communication (12GHz) and the satellite can then broadcast at 11GHz.
I really want to know the demarcation line where broadcasting is no longer an option but point to point !
Thank You
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi there :)

terresterial TV and FM radio is transmitted at much lower freqs than 2GHz, in bands from 50 MHz to ~ 700 MHz is the main region

Microwave communications freq's from 1GHz and up become more line of sight because those frequencies have a higher absorption rate as the freq increases. It only takes a wall or 2 or a few wet trees to stop or at least severely attenuate a 2.4GHz signal.

We use microwave links for line of sight point to point links because they offer very narrow beanwidths when used with dish and other directional antennas. In my activities, I have experimented on freq's up to 47GHz and as an example at 24GHz and using a 1 metre diameter dish, the -3dB beamwidth of the radiated signal is only 5 - 6 degrees VERY narrow. This has great advantages in point to point systems as there is very little power wasted as there is little spreading out of the signal.

Why then when considering the ku band ground station antennas send microwave signals to satellites which are in geostationary orbit using point to point communication (12GHz) and the satellite can then broadcast at 11GHz.

not to sure what you meant there, can you make your question/comment clearer :)

I really want to know the demarcation line where broadcasting is no longer an option but point to point !
Thank You

there is no real demarcation. any signal in the microwave bands can have a broad beamwidth ... omni-directional, or it can be point to point ... it depends on the type of antenna used.

Dave
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top