Electrons' Angular Velocity in Atomic Structure: Examining the Same V?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the angular velocity of electrons in atomic structure, particularly in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on electrons' motion and the nature of matter at high velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the angular velocity of electrons could be represented similarly to the velocity of clock hands in special relativity.
  • Another participant asserts that the Bohr model is outdated and suggests a shift to quantum mechanics for understanding atomic structure.
  • There is a query about the behavior of electrons at the speed of light and its implications for matter.
  • A suggestion is made to analyze the system in its rest frame and apply Lorentz transformations to understand its behavior in a moving frame.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of matter at relativistic speeds, with one participant speculating that matter might "vanish" under certain conditions.
  • It is noted that matter with nonzero rest mass cannot reach the speed of light, as the energy required approaches infinity as velocity approaches c.
  • One participant expresses a desire to discuss aspects of relativity that may not be fully explained, labeling their comments as speculative.
  • Another participant acknowledges the speculative nature of the discussion but points out that the statements about traveling at the speed of light contradict established relativity principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Bohr model versus quantum mechanics, the implications of relativistic speeds on matter, and the interpretation of speculative ideas related to relativity. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the behavior of matter at relativistic speeds and the challenges in reconciling classical models with quantum mechanics. Some assumptions about the nature of motion and matter remain unresolved.

MARTIN LOPEZ
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In special relativity the clock hands velocity is represented by:

V = v0*(1-v2/c2)^1/2

then:

What happen with electrons angular velocity in atomic structure?

It may be the same?:

V = v0*(1-v2/c2)^1/2

if this could be true

what happen with matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MARTIN LOPEZ said:
What happen with electrons angular velocity in atomic structure?

The Bohr model of the atom, with electrons traveling in definite orbits, has been obsolete since about 1925. You need to learn about quantum mechanics.
 
Anyway if electrons are in motion in atomic structure.
what happen with this motion, for example at the speed of light?
and what happen with matter, again?
 
Just figure out how the system behaves in its own rest frame, then use the Lorentz transformation (or time dilation + length contraction + relativity of simultaneity) to figure out how it behaves in a frame where it's moving at speed v.
 
ok. length contraction, time dilation, but matter?

I think matter vanish.....
 
MARTIN LOPEZ said:
ok. length contraction, time dilation, but matter?

I think matter vanish.....
Matter with nonzero rest mass can't travel at the speed of light in SR--if you try to accelerate a given mass to some velocity v, as v approaches c the energy you need to accelerate it to that speed approaches infinity.
 
May be I try to explain little things that relativity doesn´t explain yet (but according to relativity), but I can continue, everything I say after this will be called speculative.
 
That's kinda the definition of speculative, yes. However, what you've said about traveling at C is not beyond what Relativity discusses, it just contradicts it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K