Electrons are not elementary particles?

In summary, scientists have successfully split an electron into three quasiparticles in a laboratory setting. However, this does not contradict the standard model of particle physics as these quasiparticles are not considered fundamental particles but rather emergent phenomena that arise from the complex interactions of electrons in solids. Therefore, this experiment does not require an update to the standard model.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nav said:
http://www.nature.com/news/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471
Scientists have split an electron into 3 quasiparticles in the lab, why isn't this updated on the standard model?

It's says so right there in the second paragraph of your link:

Isolated electrons cannot be split into smaller components, earning them the designation of a fundamental particle.

See also, the definition of "quasi":

quasi- Being partly or almost: quasicrystalline

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/quasi-[/URL]

So these quasiparticles aren't actually 'real' particles in the standard model sense, but are emergent from the behaviour of electrons in solids or collections of atoms. There are a lot of quasiparticles - the notion of the 'phonon' is probably the most important/famous one - modes of vibration in the crystal lattice. [URL='[PLAIN]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quasiparticles']https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quasiparticles[/URL]
[/URL]
ETA: wikipedia link [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle[/URL]

[QUOTE]In physics, [B]quasiparticles[/B] and [B]collective excitations[/B] (which are closely related) are emergent phenomena that occur when a microscopically complicated system such as a solid behaves [I]as if[/I] it contained different weakly interacting particles in free space. For example, as an electron travels through a semiconductor, its motion is disturbed in a complex way by its interactions with all of the other electrons and nuclei; however it [I]approximately[/I] behaves like an electron with a [I]different mass[/I] traveling unperturbed through free space. This "electron" with a different mass is called an "electron quasiparticle".[1] In another example, the aggregate motion of electrons in the valence band of a semiconductor is the same as if the semiconductor contained instead positively charged quasiparticles called holes. Other quasiparticles or collective excitations include phonons (particles derived from the vibrations of atoms in a solid), plasmons (particles derived from plasma oscillations), and many others.[/QUOTE]

Think of them as convenient ways to deal with quantum many body dynamics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, vanhees71, DrClaude and 1 other person
  • #3
Well, these are called quasiparticles for a reason. This has more to do with the weirdness of the quantum world than the electron not being a fundamental particle. See this.
 
  • #5
Nav said:
http://www.nature.com/news/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471
Scientists have split an electron into 3 quasiparticles in the lab, why isn't this updated on the standard model?
To use an analogy from everyday life, this is not much different from spliting a man into a naked man and his clothes. The electron-experiment above has no more implications for the standard model than my man-experiment has for biology.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

What does it mean that electrons are not elementary particles?

It means that electrons are not the smallest, indivisible units of matter. They are made up of even smaller particles called quarks.

Why were electrons originally thought to be elementary particles?

Electrons were originally thought to be elementary particles because they were one of the first particles to be discovered and were believed to be indivisible.

What evidence supports the idea that electrons are not elementary particles?

Experimental evidence, such as particle accelerators, has shown that electrons can be broken down into smaller particles and they exhibit properties that are not explainable by them being elementary particles.

What are the implications of electrons not being elementary particles?

The implications are that there may be even smaller particles that make up electrons and that our understanding of the fundamental building blocks of matter may need to be revised.

What is the current scientific understanding of the structure of electrons?

Currently, the most widely accepted understanding is that electrons are made up of three quarks: two "up" quarks and one "down" quark. These quarks are held together by the strong force, which is one of the four fundamental forces of nature.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
929
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
380
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
864
Replies
6
Views
766
Back
Top