How do electrons maintain a stable distance from the nucleus?

Mukilab
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Please correct me if I am wrong in any of this
1) Electrons are able to go around the nucleus of an atom due to the centrifugal force resulting from the weak/strong force (one of them)
2) Quantum physics says that particles can be in 2 places at the same time.
3) Therefore can't an electron be in the same place over a period of time (although it is probably unlikely) therefore no longer having any centrifugal force
4) The lack of centrifugal force will make the electron spiral into the centre of the atom.

Please could anyone help me out here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons do not orbit the nucleus as a planet orbits the sun. This analogy was known to be wrong 100 years ago, in fact some of the same reasoning was applied.

Electrons are said to occupy shells. I think you will benefit if you look at Wikipedia or some other basic sources to gain some additional insight.

All quantum particles can be said to have a probability of being in more than one place.
 
DrChinese said:
Electrons do not orbit the nucleus as a planet orbits the sun. This analogy was known to be wrong 100 years ago, in fact some of the same reasoning was applied.

Electrons are said to occupy shells. I think you will benefit if you look at Wikipedia or some other basic sources to gain some additional insight.

All quantum particles can be said to have a probability of being in more than one place.

How do electrons remain a certain distance from the nucleus?
 
Mukilab said:
How do electrons remain a certain distance from the nucleus?

Because of the uncertainty principle. As an electron's average position gets closer and closer to the nucleus, the area that it occupies becomes smaller and smaller and the average momentum increases. It is a property of the wave function.
 
Mukilab said:
How do electrons remain a certain distance from the nucleus?

They don't. In general, an atomic electron has a certain probability of being at any distance from the nucleus, albeit extremely small for large distances. It even has some probability of being inside the nucleus, which leads to the nuclear decay process called electron capture.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top