Electroplating - radioactive materials in my drawer?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the discovery of a container labeled as containing radioactive materials in a high school physics classroom. Participants explore the potential identity of the material, reasons for its radioactivity, safety concerns regarding its storage, and appropriate actions to take in response to the find. The conversation includes elements of safety protocols, historical context of radioactive materials in educational settings, and the implications of handling such substances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls that schools historically had small radioactive sources for experiments, suggesting that the material might be similar and should be checked immediately.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of reporting the find to proper authorities, stating that it is a legal requirement in the UK to report potential hazards.
  • Some participants propose that the material could be vanadium or a radioactive form of zinc, but this remains speculative.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of leaving the container uncovered, with suggestions to use a Geiger counter to assess radioactivity, although limitations of such devices are noted.
  • There is a suggestion that the radioactive label could be a joke, but participants agree that it should not be treated lightly without proper verification.
  • One participant mentions that pure alpha emitters may not be detected by a Geiger counter, indicating that caution is necessary regardless of the device's readings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of reporting the discovery to authorities and the importance of safety. However, there is disagreement regarding the identification of the material and the implications of its radioactivity, with no consensus on what the material actually is or its safety status.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific information about the material's identity, the historical context of radioactive materials in schools, and the potential for misinterpretation of safety based on Geiger counter readings.

Spacey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! I'm a high school science teacher who was recently switched to teaching physics for the first time mid-year.

I remember doing an electroplating demonstration in my gradeschool days for a science fair. It was fascinating and now I want to give my students a chance to do some hands-on science with this very useful process.

This is the website I liked the best because of its simplicity in materials and procedure: https://www.homesciencetools.com/a/electroplating-science-project

I began to check for materials in the old backroom of the physics classroom and found a huge cache of copper and iron electrodes. The trouble is, I also found a plastic container filled with what looks like zinc or iron electrodes, but the container has a Radioactive Material warning on it! I'd attach a picture I took but this forum wants an image url and I don't remember my ancient photobucket password...

My questions (at this moment) are: What could this material be? Why is it radioactive? Is it safe to leave uncovered in a drawer for so long? Is it a joke? What should I do about it (if anything)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest that you press the big red button and refer this up the line to your manager and safety rep. Historically, schools had a massive amount of substances that are not needed for modern courses and which are potential Chemical or Radioactive hazards. They are not part of modern syllabi.
In the UK, at least, if you find a potential hazard it is a legal requirement that you report it. It won't matter if the stuff you have found is harmless.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Spacey and Nidum
Back in the 1970s the school i went to had a small radioactive sources for physics experiments. As i remember it was kept in a lead lined wooden box when not in use but could be handled by students.

I would get yours checked out asap.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spacey
Spacey said:
I'd attach a picture I took but this forum wants an image url and I don't remember my ancient photobucket password...

you can upload images from your computer quite easily use the upload button, lower right side of the text box you type a response in ... no need for an image url

as far as the sample goes, a local university geology or physics dept would probably gladly take it off your hands
When I was doing geology at university, one of the departments had a solid chunk of pitchblende in a lead crucible, it would make my Geiger counter go crazy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spacey and sophiecentaur
Spacey said:
What could this material be? Why is it radioactive? Is it safe to leave uncovered in a drawer for so long?

How do you expect us to answer any of these things? How is this different from "I have an object in my hand now - what is it?"

You need to report it to the proper authorities. A bunch of guys on the internet are not the proper authorities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and mfb
Vanadium, because I said it was with electroplating stuff and it looked like zinc electrodes. I thought maybe someone had used a radioactive form before that could remember doing so...

Oh, and of course I notified someone, silly. But I still wanted to engage in some 'friendly' inquiry...if that's ok with you, that is ;)
 
Last edited:
Spacey said:
Hello! I'm a high school science teacher who was recently switched to teaching physics for the first time mid-year.

I remember doing an electroplating demonstration in my gradeschool days for a science fair. It was fascinating and now I want to give my students a chance to do some hands-on science with this very useful process.

This is the website I liked the best because of its simplicity in materials and procedure: https://www.homesciencetools.com/a/electroplating-science-project

I began to check for materials in the old backroom of the physics classroom and found a huge cache of copper and iron electrodes. The trouble is, I also found a plastic container filled with what looks like zinc or iron electrodes, but the container has a Radioactive Material warning on it! I'd attach a picture I took but this forum wants an image url and I don't remember my ancient photobucket password...

My questions (at this moment) are: What could this material be? Why is it radioactive? Is it safe to leave uncovered in a drawer for so long? Is it a joke? What should I do about it (if anything)?

I agree with the other posters- you must report finding that container *immediately* to your principal and whomever is in charge of facilities. Maybe the sticker is a joke- but maybe it's not, and you can't treat it as a joke.
 
  • #10
DrDu said:
I would check with a Geiger counter first. It is very sensitive and if it doens't go crazy when you come near the box, you can be sure it is not a radioactive material.
Compare to page 27 from here:
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub815_web.pdf

You won't detect alpha radiation with the Geiger counter. Pure alpha emitters are rare, but don't assume something is not radioactive just because a Geiger counter didn't react.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Spacey
  • #11
mfb said:
, but don't assume something is not radioactive just because a Geiger counter didn't react.

Tritium, for example, will not set off a Geiger counter with a typical window.

As for saying it looks kind of like zinc (or earlier, iron) doesn't help much with identification. "It didn't look radioactive" is not a very good argument.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K