Electrostatic E Fields - Possible/Impossible

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical conditions for electric fields, specifically the requirement that the curl of the field must be zero for it to be considered a possible electric field. It raises questions about the implications of unconventional potential functions and the physical feasibility of charge distributions. The consensus is that an electric field cannot have a non-zero curl if it is derived from a potential, as the curl of any gradient is zero. However, scenarios exist where an electric field can be mathematically impossible despite having a zero curl, particularly if singularities are involved. The conversation also touches on the implications of Faraday's law, which introduces complexities in the relationship between electric and magnetic fields.
bangkokphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question pertaining to mathematically possible E fields.

I've always known the curl of the field has to be zero for the field to be a possible electric field, but is this the sole determining factor? What about if the potential is some wonky function that doesn't seem plausible, and what about discontinuities?

Also, a semantics question, would you think an electric field is mathematically possible if the charge distribution is physically impossible to create?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about an infinitesimal point that has some charge on it. If the field could curl then there could be a spiral of field lines around that point. That wouldn't jive with what physicists have always measured for the field of a point charge, namely, Coulomb's law.

You can actually write a vector equation for Coulomb's law, curl it, and get 0.

As for the second question. I bet you can invent a charge distribution that approaches infinity at some point yet still have a convergent field somewhere. For instance The field may be finite directy in the middle of two bodies whose charge approaches infinity the further away they are.
 
I guess my question can really be boiled down to two questions:

1. Can an electric field function be mathematically possible while its curl is non-zero?
and
2. Can an electric field function be mathematically IMpossible while its curl is zero.
 
1. No. The curl of any gradient is 0. There's a proof for that. The E field is the gradient of the charge distribution therefore its curl is 0.

2. Do you mean physically impossible? If so, maybe.
 
@ Okefenokee: The E field is the gradient of the electric potential field, not the charge distribution.

2. Yes, but only if the curl has a singularity at a point. For instance the field (-y/r^2, x/r^2) (the so-called irrotational vortex) has zero curl everywhere, except at the center, where it's not defined (it can be understood to be infinite). If you compute the line integral around the center, you'll find out it's non-zero, in fact, it's equal to 2\pi. If a contour integral is non-zero, then the field isn't conservative, and thus there can be no potential field.

BTW, in electrodynamics, all of this ceases to be true: Faraday's law says that a changing magnetic field generates a curling electric field at the same point. Similarly, a changing electric field generates a curling magnetic field at the same point. This feedback process originates propagation of electromagnetic waves.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top