Electrostatic Potential over all space

AI Thread Summary
To find the electrostatic potential of a sphere with a given charge distribution and an additional charge at the origin, one can use the formula V(r) = (1/4πε₀)∫(ρ(r')/r)dt', integrating from 0 to R for the charge distribution. The integration should also consider contributions from outside the radius, extending from infinity to R. For calculating the potential at a radius r, only charges inside that radius need to be considered, allowing the use of Q(r) to represent the total charge up to r. The problem can be simplified by solving the differential equation ΔΦ = -ρ, leading to an ordinary differential equation in spherical coordinates. This approach ultimately provides an analytic expression for the electrostatic potential.
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
If I have a sphere with radius R which has a charge distribution given by

\rho(r)=\frac{5Q}{\pi R^{5}}r(r-R)

and \rho = 0 at r bigger or equal to R, how do I find the electrostatic potential of this overall space? There is a charge Q, in addition, at the origin.

My original thought was to just do the usual and use

V(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int \frac{\rho(r')}{r}dt',

which if I am correct the integration goes from 0 to R, correct. Or does it extend from infinity into R? This has never made much sense to me. Somebody help me out with this idea. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or do I integrate from 0 to R, plus integrate from R to r? That seems a lot more in line with "over all-space". . . let me know your thoughts.
 
For the potential at a given radius r, you can neglect all charges outside (r'>r) and assume that all charges inside are at r'=0. This is similar to gravity, and follows from the spherical symmetry.

Therefore, for radius r, \frac{dV(r)}{dr}=\frac{Q(r)}{r^2} with prefactors depending on your units. Q(r) is the total charge up to radius r: Q(r)=Q_0 + \int_0^r 4 \pi r'^2 \rho(r') dr'.
You can find an analytic expression for Q(r), this can be used in the first equation, and another integration will give you the potential.
 
I'd rather solve the differential equation (written in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
\Delta \Phi=-\rho.
Since the charge distribution is radially symmetric, you can make the ansatz in spherical coordinates,
\Phi(\vec{x})=\Phi(r).
Then from the Laplacian in spherical coordinates you get
\Delta \Phi=\frac{1}{r^2} [r^2 \Phi'(r)]',
and the equation becomes an ordinary differential equation, which you have to solve with the appropriate boundary conditions. This leads to mfb's solution (modulo a sign and prefactors depending on the system of units used).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top