Electrostatics, sphere question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a spherical conductor with two cavities containing point charges. The total charge of the conductor is zero, which means the charges within the cavities influence the charge distribution on the conductor's surface. Gauss's law is applied to analyze the electric fields and forces acting on the charges. The interaction of the external charge qd with the internal charges qb and qc is also considered, particularly how the conductor's charge configuration affects these interactions. The participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the problem to better understand the electric field behavior and force relationships.
vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A spherical conductor A contains two spherical cavities. The total charge on the is itself zero. However, there is a point charge qb at the center of one cavity and qc at the center of other cavity. A considerable distance r away from the center of the spherical conductor, there is a another change qd. Force acting on qb , qc, qd, are F1 ,F2,F3 respectively [assume all changes are positive.]then fill the dashed lines with <,>,=
F1______F2______F3

Homework Equations



I use inly one equation in such questions that is
Code:
closed integral over closed surface(E.ds)=q/e.
It is gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to do this with gauss law but failed. can you please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried creating a visual representation to choose your Gaussian surfaces? The problem appears (as you've written it) to say that there is a pair of point charges in the cavities. The charge on a conductor aligns itself to negate any net electric field. What does this tell you about the charge configuration on the conductor if its net charge is 0?

What does this mean about the way the external charge qd interacts with the other charges?
 
diagram of question
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 451
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top