Elementary Equation solving mind-block

  • Thread starter Thread starter truewt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary
truewt
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hi I have some problems with really basic equations (really elementary)

Let's say in order to solve an equation f(x)=0, we multiply the equation by x. Therefore we conclude that x can never be =0. But what if at the end step we conclude that x=0 (maybe along with other solutions)? Do we reject the answer and accept the others? Or is our method of solving the equation incorrect?

I do know that it is quite impossible for you to arrive at x=0 after you multiply x throughout in order to solve the equation, as that would mean you had introduced an unnecessary common multiple into the equation..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
truewt said:
Hi I have some problems with really basic equations (really elementary)

Let's say in order to solve an equation f(x)=0, we multiply the equation by x. Therefore we conclude that x can never be =0.
Why would we conclude that?

But what if at the end step we conclude that x=0 (maybe along with other solutions)? Do we reject the answer and accept the others? Or is our method of solving the equation incorrect?

I do know that it is quite impossible for you to arrive at x=0 after you multiply x throughout in order to solve the equation, as that would mean you had introduced an unnecessary common multiple into the equation..
I'm not at all clear what you are saying here. Certainly if you just take an arbitrary equation, say x2= 0, and multiply both sides by x, you can arrive at x= 0: x3= 0 so x= 0. You may be thinking of an equation in which you have good reason to multiply by x- say something like (x-1)/x= 0. In that case, even before you multiply by x, you know that x= 0 cannot be a solution.
It is well known that if you multiply both sides of an equation by any function of x, you may introduce "extraneous" roots: numbers that satisfy the new equation but not the original. The only way to be sure is to check the numbers in the original equation.
 
Alright thanks. Sorry for not visiting this thread after so long.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top