Elementary Equation solving mind-block

  • Thread starter Thread starter truewt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary
AI Thread Summary
When solving the equation f(x)=0 by multiplying both sides by x, it is crucial to remember that x cannot equal zero, as this introduces extraneous solutions. If a solution of x=0 is obtained, it should be rejected if it contradicts the initial conditions of the equation. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying solutions against the original equation to avoid accepting incorrect answers. Multiplying by a variable can lead to misleading results, emphasizing the need for caution in algebraic manipulation. Ultimately, checking solutions in the original equation is essential for accuracy.
truewt
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hi I have some problems with really basic equations (really elementary)

Let's say in order to solve an equation f(x)=0, we multiply the equation by x. Therefore we conclude that x can never be =0. But what if at the end step we conclude that x=0 (maybe along with other solutions)? Do we reject the answer and accept the others? Or is our method of solving the equation incorrect?

I do know that it is quite impossible for you to arrive at x=0 after you multiply x throughout in order to solve the equation, as that would mean you had introduced an unnecessary common multiple into the equation..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
truewt said:
Hi I have some problems with really basic equations (really elementary)

Let's say in order to solve an equation f(x)=0, we multiply the equation by x. Therefore we conclude that x can never be =0.
Why would we conclude that?

But what if at the end step we conclude that x=0 (maybe along with other solutions)? Do we reject the answer and accept the others? Or is our method of solving the equation incorrect?

I do know that it is quite impossible for you to arrive at x=0 after you multiply x throughout in order to solve the equation, as that would mean you had introduced an unnecessary common multiple into the equation..
I'm not at all clear what you are saying here. Certainly if you just take an arbitrary equation, say x2= 0, and multiply both sides by x, you can arrive at x= 0: x3= 0 so x= 0. You may be thinking of an equation in which you have good reason to multiply by x- say something like (x-1)/x= 0. In that case, even before you multiply by x, you know that x= 0 cannot be a solution.
It is well known that if you multiply both sides of an equation by any function of x, you may introduce "extraneous" roots: numbers that satisfy the new equation but not the original. The only way to be sure is to check the numbers in the original equation.
 
Alright thanks. Sorry for not visiting this thread after so long.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top