Elementary question:[A,B] = [A-<A>, B-<B>]

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
I know this should be obvious, and I should be ashamed of asking it, but could someone fill in the steps to show that [A,B] = [A-<A>, B-<B>]? Thanks from a non-physicist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<A> is a real number (or if A isn't self-adjoint, a complex number), so A-<A> must be interpreted as A-<A>I, where I is the identity operator, which commutes with everything.

The forum's policy on homework and textbook-style questions prevents me from giving you the complete answer, but I think you will find it easy to show that [A+B,C]=[A,C]+[B,C], and [A,B+C]=[A,B]+[A,C] for all A,B,C. Then you can use these formulas to deal with [A+B,C+D]. When you have done that, let B and D be operators that commute with everything ([B,X]=[D,X] for all X) and see what you get.

Edit: Hehe. I cleverly made sure my reply would be the first by posting the first paragraph as soon as I was done with it and then adding the second one in an edit. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Well, A-<A> means A-<A>1 , where the '1' is the unit operator on the vector space these operators act on. The unit operator commutes with every other operator, including itself, that's why you have the equality of the 2 commutators.
 
Thanks, first-past-the-post Fredrik, and also to bigubau. That should do it.

Fredrik: Just as a side note, this was not a homework question: I wish it were, because I miss academia. But you're right, it's textbook style. Alas, I am limited in the number of textbooks I have as reference. Hence my double gratitude for this Forum and knowledgeable people like you on it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top