Elevator starts from rest with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average power of a 650kg elevator that accelerates from rest to a cruising speed of 1.75m/s over 3 seconds. Participants emphasize using kinematic equations to determine the height traveled, which is found to be 2.63m. The conversation highlights two methods for calculating work: using the formula W = force * distance or applying energy conservation principles. It is noted that both approaches should yield the same result, reinforcing the importance of understanding the relationship between force, distance, and energy. Ultimately, both methods are valid for solving the problem effectively.
splac6996
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


650kg elevator starts from rest. It moves upward for 3.00s with constant acceleration until it reches its cruising speed of 1.75m/s. What is the average power of the elevator motor during this period?


Homework Equations


use either force or conservation of energy


The Attempt at a Solution


I first used my kinematic equations to find the height which the elevator travels where I am getting stuck is by finding the work to solve for power is it as simple as using w=force*distance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is that simple. The force is constant during the acceleration phase. You just have to find it. You already have distance from your kinematics.
 
if I wanted to find work by using energy equation what would that look like. The reason i ask is because I should be able to use that equation as well and get the same answer.
 
I think you do need to do some kinematics. There's lots of ways to go from 0 to 1.75m/sec, all with different power requirements. You need both final time and final distance and the relation between those is kinematics.
 
well I know that my final time is 3.00s and the final distance I found to be 2.63m. But for my energy equation should equal work
 
Ok, then you are all set. You could add the final kinetic energy and final gravitational potential energy to get total work. Or you could work out force and multiply by the distance. Both should give you the same result.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top