MHB Elizabeth's question at Yahoo Answers regarding the computation of work

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to empty water from a cylindrical tank in two scenarios: the top half and the bottom half. The work is derived using calculus, specifically through integration of the force needed to lift water slices against gravity. For the top half, the work calculated is 1,411,200π J, while for the bottom half, it is double that amount at 2,822,400π J. The interpretation of the work done relates to the area of a trapezoid formed by the linear function of the integrand. Overall, the calculations demonstrate how the height from which water is lifted significantly affects the total work required.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus help upper and lower half?

A cylinder with height 8 m and radius 3 m is filled with water and must be emptied through an outlet pipe 2 m above the top of the cylinder.

(A) compute the work required to empty the water in the top half of the tank
(B) compute the work required to empty the equal amount of water in the lower half of the tank
(C) interpret

Please show any steps you used. Thanks!

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus help upper and lower half? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Elizabeth,

I prefer to work problems in general terms, and derive a formula we may then plug our data into. Let's let the radius of the cylindrical tank be $r$, the height of the tank be $h$ and the additional distance above the tank the fluid must be pumped be $q$. All measures are in meters.

Let's then imagine the surface of the fluid is initially a distance $h_1$ from the top of the tank, and we wish to pump out fluid until the surface is a distance $h_2$ from the top of the tank. We will let $W$ be the amount of work required to accomplish this task.

We will use a vertical $y$-axis along which to integrate. Now, if we imagine slicing the cylinder of water we wish to remove into disks, we may state, using work is force times distance for a constant force:

$$dW=Fd=mgd$$

The force exerted is equal to the weight of the slice, which is the product of the mass and the acceleration due to gravity.

The mass $m$ of the slice is the product of the mass density $\rho$ (in $$\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}$$) and the volume $$V=\pi r^2\,dy$$ of the slice, i.e.:

$m=\rho\pi r^2\,dy$

The distance the slice must be vertically moved against gravity is:

$d=q+y$

Putting it all together, we have:

$$dW=\rho\pi g r^2(q+y)\,dy$$

Now, to find the total work done, we may sum the work differentials through integration:

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\int_{h_1}^{h_2}(q+y)\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the FTOC, we find:

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left[qy+\frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_{h_1}^{h_2}$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left(\left(qh_2+\frac{1}{2}h_2^2 \right)-\left(qh_1+\frac{1}{2}h_1^2 \right) \right)$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left(q(h_2-h_1)+\frac{1}{2}(h_2^2-h_1^2) \right)$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2(h_2-h_1)\left(q+\frac{1}{2}(h_2+h_1) \right)$$

$$W=\frac{1}{2}\rho\pi g r^2(h_2-h_1)\left(h_1+h_2+2q \right)$$

Now we may plug in the given/known data

Water is generally taken to have a mass density of:

$$\rho=1000\,\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}$$

I will assume we are to use:

$$g=9.8\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s^2}}$$

We are given:

$r=3\text{ m},\,q=2\text{ m},\,h=8\text{ m}$

For part (A), we have:

$$h_1=0\text{ m},\,h_2=\frac{h}{2}=4\text{ m}$$

Hence:

$$W_A=1411200\pi\text{ J}$$

For part (B), we have:

$$h_1=\frac{h}{2}\,\text{m}=4\text{ m},\,h_2=h=8\text{ m}$$

Hence:

$$W_B=2822400\pi\text{ J}=2W_A$$

(C) If we interpret the amount of work done as the area of a trapezoid, since the integrand is a linear function, we find that:

$$W_A=k\cdot\frac{1}{2}(6+2)4=16k$$

$$W_B=k\cdot\frac{1}{2}(10+6)4=32k=2W_A$$
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top