Ellipsoid Equation: Finding the Classical Form with Rotated Radii

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipsoid
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,
given an ellipsoid in parametric form in t, I was trying to get to the classical equation in x,y. Things are very straightforward, as long as the ellipse radii are aligned with the principal axes. Instead, I am trying to find the equation of a "rotated" ellipse, given a parametrization in t.

I tried the following... Let's define the position vector:

\mathbf{r}(t) = \mathbf{a}cos(t) + \mathbf{b}sin(t)

where:
\mathbf{a}=a_1\mathbf{e_1} + a_2\mathbf{e_2}
\mathbf{b}=b_1\mathbf{e_1} + b_2\mathbf{e_2}

and we have that <\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}>=0, that is, the directional radii are perpendicular but not aligned to the main axes.
Since x = <\mathbf{r},\mathbf{e_1}>, and y = <\mathbf{r},\mathbf{e_2}>, we have:

x = a_1cos(t) + b_1sin(t)
y = a_2cos(t) + b_2sin(t)

At this point I got stuck, because I can't manage to get rid of t. When the ellipse is aligned to the main axes we have b_1=0, and a_2=0, and everything becomes easy by squaring the terms.
I know that the final result should be of the form: \mathbf{x^T}A\mathbf{x} where A is symmetric positive definite, but I can't really get there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your ellipse is centered at the origin.
You have two equations (linear in \cos t and \sin t). Solve them like this: \cos t = ??, \sin t = ??, both right-hand-sides linear in x,y. Then take the equation \sin^2 t + \cos^2 t = 1, substitute in your results, you get something quadratic in x,y.
 
Thanks a lot!
I can't believe I didn't immediately find such an easy solution! It has been under my eyes all the time (even on my notes) but yesterday I simply missed it :/ ... I should punish myself now :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top