Elliptic functions, diff eq, why proof on open disc holds for C

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of a differential equation satisfied by the function φ(z) within an open disc D. The main concern is understanding why the proof that holds in D can be extended to the entire complex plane, especially given the convergence condition |z/ω|<1. Participants highlight that the concept of "analytic extension" is crucial for this transition, allowing results proven in a smaller domain to apply to larger connected open sets. There is a noted lack of familiarity with the term "analytic extension" among some participants. The conversation emphasizes the importance of this concept in complex analysis.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


Hi

I am looking at this derivation of differential equation satisfied by ##\phi(z)##.

diff.png
diff2.png


To start with, I know that such a disc ##D## described in the derivation can always be found because earlier in the lecture notes we proved that their exists an ##inf=min \omega ## for ##\omega \in \Omega/{0} ##Following the derivation through I agree that ##f(z)=0##, however, the trouble I’m having is why having that this proof holds on the disc ##D##, extending it to the entire complex plane?

if a function is constant then its constant everywhere, but because we required convergence and ##|z/\omega|<1## haven't we only shown that this differential equation is satisfied for such a disc?Many thanks

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
see below
 

Attachments

  • diff.png
    diff.png
    43.5 KB · Views: 612
  • diff2.png
    diff2.png
    20.8 KB · Views: 595
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Has the concept of "analytic extension" not been explained in the notes?

Because whenever you prove something for a holomorphic function in an open disc and immediately extend the result to some larger connected open set (such as the entire complex plane), it's analytic extension that is being used.
 
pasmith said:
Has the concept of "analytic extension" not been explained in the notes?

Because whenever you prove something for a holomorphic function in an open disc and immediately extend the result to some larger connected open set (such as the entire complex plane), it's analytic extension that is being used.

Never heard of that term, nope.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K