Elliptical Orbits In The Schwarzschild Metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating the proper time for an observer in a freely falling elliptical orbit within the Schwarzschild metric. Participants explore the differences in proper time elapsed between observers in circular and elliptical orbits, as well as the nature of such orbits in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to calculate proper time for an elliptical orbit, noting they understand the circular case.
  • Another participant asserts that there are no geodesic elliptical orbits and emphasizes the need for more information to calculate the time for non-geodesic elliptical orbits.
  • A participant adds that non-circular orbits in the Schwarzschild metric do not return to the same point due to perihelion advance, complicating the definition of elliptical orbits.
  • It is suggested that a non-circular trajectory can be arranged to meet a circular orbit at two events, with the aging of the observers depending on the relative positions of their orbits.
  • One participant introduces the concept of closed "spirograph" orbits under specific conditions related to precession angles.
  • References are provided for further reading on the topic of time-like geodesics and the precession of orbits in general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of elliptical orbits in the Schwarzschild metric, with no consensus reached on the proper time calculations or the characteristics of such orbits.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the nature of orbits, the definitions of geodesic versus non-geodesic paths, and the implications of perihelion precession on the orbits discussed.

dman12
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering how you would go about calculating the proper time for an observer following a freely falling elliptical orbit in a Schwarzschild metric.

I am happy with how to calculate the proper time for a circular orbit and was wondering whether if you had two observers start and end at the same spacetime point, for whom would more proper time elapse- one that followed a circular orbit or one that followed an elliptical orbit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I far as I know, there aren't geodesic (i.e., freely falling) elliptical orbits. There are elliptical orbits that are non-geodesics, but, to calculate the time required for one orbit, more knowledge of the orbit is required.

Also, ven circular orbits do not "start and end at the same spacetime point", as time elapses.
 
To add a bit to George Jones answer, non-circular orbits in SC metric never quite close (due to perihelion advance), so they are not ellipses.

You certainly can arrange for a non-circular (near elliptic) free faller to meet a circular orbiter at two events. Then, the general rule is that the if the non-circular trajectory is outside of circular orbit between meetings, the non-circular free faller will age more. Conversely, if you arrange it so non-circular trajectory is inside the circular orbit between meetings, the circular orbiter will age more.
 
In very, very special circumstances, there are (freely falling) closed "spirograph" orbits.

A condition for a closed orbit is that the precession angle divides evenly into an integral multiple of 360 degrees, i.e., n*360/(precession angle) = m, where n and m are integers. If this is true, then the total precession after m aphelia is n times 360 degrees, hence the repetition.
 
Here are a couple of references that might help with the calculation

Uros Kostic, Analytical time-like geodesics in Schwarzschild
space-time. General Relativity and Gravitation, 2012.
Preprint :http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.5611v1.pdf

G. V. Kraniotis, S. B. Whitehouse,
Precession of Mercury in General Relativity, the Cosmolog-
ical Constant and Jacobi’s Inversion problem.
Preprint http://128.84.158.119/abs/astro-ph/0305181v3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K