ElMag: Current-carrying Conductor, B inside a Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter starrymirth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Hole
starrymirth
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
My boyfriend and I have been bashing our head against this past exam question for some time now, any physical insight would be appreciated.

Homework Statement


A long straight conductor has a circular cross-section of radius R and carries a current I. Through the conductor, there is a cylindrical hole of radius a whose axis is parallel to the axis of the conductor and at a distance b from it. [From the cross-sectional diagram, a<b]

a) Show that the magnitude of the magnetic induction at the centre of the hole is equal to:
B = \frac{\mu_0 bI}{2\pi(R^2-a^2)}

b) Show that the magnitude of the magnetic induction is uniform inside the hole.

2 The attempt at a solution

(a) If I treat the wire and hole as two super-imposed wires, with the "wire" that is the hole carrying the same current in the opposite direction, then I can find B at the centre of the hole (albeit with some difficulty).

(b) I don't know. Any physical insight into why the B-field inside the hole is the same everywhere?

Thanks,
Laura
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Laura,

As far as why the magnitude should be constant inside the hole:
When using ampere's law inside (r<R) a cylindrically symmetric current distribution we have that the magnitude of the magnetic field is proportional to the distance from the axis of the cylinder, r.
When also considering that the direction of the magnetic field is \hat{r}\times\hat{I} we get that \vec{B} \propto \vec{r}\times\vec{I}.

Considering your problem of two equal currents running in opposite directions, the net magnetic field is the sum of the contributions from each current (i.e. use the superposition principle).
\vec{B_{net}} = \vec{B_{+}} + \vec{B_{-}}
Since we are 'inside' both current distributions (r < R) what was said above about the magnetic field still applies so:
\vec{B_{net}} \propto \vec{r_{+}}\times\vec{I} + \vec{r_{-}}\times\vec{-I} = (\vec{r_{+}} - \vec{r_{-}}) \times \vec{I}

Where \vec{r_{+/-}} is the vector pointing from the axis of the positive/negative current to the point where we are interested in the magnetic field.
Note that the fact that the magnitude of the currents being equal is important in order to write the proportionality this way.
Now if you draw a picture you can see that \vec{r_{+}} - \vec{r_{-}} is just the vector pointing from the axis of the positive current to the axis of the negative current, therefore it is a constant.
Thus the magnetic field is proportional to the cross product of two constant vectors, and is therefore constant inside the hole.

There is a similar problem in electrostatics where you find the field of a spherical hole inside a spherical charge distribution and you get a similar result (using Gauss' law instead of Ampere's).
I don't know if this counts as 'physical' insight, but the problem is inherently geometrical (which is pretty much true of all classical E&M). The idea is that as you move around in the hole you get closer or further from parts of the current, but on the whole these effects cancel out the magnetic field remains constant.

Hope that helps :)
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top