I EM equations - am I missing something?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a perceived mismatch in Maxwell's equations, where there are 8 equations but only 6 unknown variables, leading to confusion about the system's degrees of freedom. It is clarified that position and time are independent variables, not parameters, which affects the counting of equations and variables. The necessity of boundary conditions is emphasized, indicating that without them, the system would be underdetermined. The conversation concludes that a one-to-one ratio between equations and unknowns is not required for differential equations, resolving the initial confusion. Overall, the complexities of electromagnetic equations and their dependencies on boundary conditions are underscored.
Maxicl14
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Summary:: There seems to be a mismatch, in the "Maxwell's" equations, between the number of equations and number of variables.

I was trying to play around with the equations for Electromagnetism and noticed something unusual. When expanded, there are 8 equations, 6 unknown variables, and 4 parameter variables. When the parameter variables are set using 4 more equations, the result is 10 variables and 12 equations. This seems 2 equations too many.

The variables I am referring to:
Ex, Ey, Ez, Bx, By, Bz,
x, y, z, t

The equations I am referring to:
1 from divergence of E
1 from divergence of B
3 from curl of E
3 from curl of B
4 from setting parameters: x=X, y=Y, z=Z, t=T.To give an example, the simple harmonic equations may be:
(d2/dt2) X(t) = -X(t)
t = T
This results in a unique solution of X (at t=T). 2 equations. 2 variables. Unique solution.

So why do Maxwell's equations behave differently, or do they? May it be to do with initial conditions? May some equations imply others?

Thank you, Max.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing a lot, I'm afraid. Let's start with the biggest one: if you did not have additional degrees of freedom the system would be completely determined without needing to specify the boundary conditions. Therefore the system wouldn't depend on the boundary conditions, so E&M would not be useful - there would be fields that were what they were and that would be that.
 
I understand that boundary conditions can be set, for example through the J function. Or by introducing another equation.
But here surely there are "-2" degrees of freedom, not 2 degrees of freedom, so the system seems oversaturated with constraints...
Do some equations/relations imply others?
 
Your counting seems weird. There are 6 functions of position and time (the components of the fields). Position and time are not parameters but independent variables. And you have 8 differential equations.
If you have one unknown function and one differential equation you cannot completely determine the function. These are not algebraic equations to have a 1 to 1 ratio between equations and unknowns.
 
nasu said:
Your counting seems weird. There are 6 functions of position and time (the components of the fields). Position and time are not parameters but independent variables. And you have 8 differential equations.
If you have one unknown function and one differential equation you cannot completely determine the function. These are not algebraic equations to have a 1 to 1 ratio between equations and unknowns.
Oh ok. So 1 to 1 not necessary. Thank you.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top