EM radiation => Self propagating wave ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the term "self-propagating wave" in relation to electromagnetic (EM) radiation. Participants debate the appropriateness of the word "self," arguing that it may mislead since waves do not possess consciousness or agency. They suggest that describing EM radiation as a wave-particle with electric and magnetic components at right angles provides clearer information. The concept of self-propagation is challenged as potentially cyclic and insufficiently explanatory for how waves travel through a vacuum. Ultimately, the term "self" is defended as indicating that the wave propagates independently, without external interactions.
Sirandar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Both Wikipedia and my educators called electromagnetic radiation a self propagating wave.


I would suggest that the word self be removed from wikipedia at least. There is no self in a wave. Even the word "coupled" or "causally related" are risky WRT the grav and mag components as I don't think anyone understands the coupling or causality.

Saying that EM is a wave-particle with grav and mag at right angles that can propgate in a vacuum contains the same amount of real information and is more reflective of what is known IMO. (perp to line travel too)

Is there any merit to this thought?
 
Science news on Phys.org
... EM rad is a self-propagating wave. What's the problem?

I think any non-trivial solutions to laplace's equations are self-propagating waves.
 
Sirandar said:
Saying that EM is a wave-particle with grav and mag at right angles

I think you meant "elec and mag" not "grav and mag".
 
jtbell said:
I think you meant "elec and mag" not "grav and mag".
Correct
 
zhermes said:
... EM rad is a self-propagating wave. What's the problem?

I think any non-trivial solutions to laplace's equations are self-propagating waves.

The self propagating term uses the word self to try to explain something that hasn't been explained properly. A wave has no self. They travel though a vacuum because they do.

You could easily say that an EM has two functions that interconvert and this makes it self propagating, but seems to me that is cyclic thinking and I personally can't see how that explains how it can move through a vacuum.

Don't really know how wave A moves though space
Don't really know how wave B moves though space

Wave A creates Wave B and Wave B creates Wave A, so that explains how both waves move though space.

Just doesn't sit right

My 2 cents
 
The word "self" in this context doesn't imply any consciousness, but means the wave propagates "by itself" without the need for any interactions with anything else. We also use self in this context when we say something is "self-similar". Saying the Mandelbrot set is "self-similar" doesn't imply that it is a conscious being, just that it is similar to itself.
 
phyzguy said:
means the wave propagates without the need for any interactions with anything else

That definition fits
 
Back
Top