EM Waves & Conservation of Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between electromagnetic waves and the conservation of energy, particularly in the context of AC circuits and the behavior of inductors and capacitors. Participants explore concepts related to power consumption, electromagnetic radiation, and the conditions under which these phenomena become significant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Sandeep questions the source of power consumption in a coil when it is placed in the electromagnetic field of an AC circuit, noting that some devices operate without their own power source.
  • One participant argues that the power loss in an AC circuit includes both heat loss and energy radiated away as radio waves.
  • Another participant suggests that energy radiated from the AC circuit can be converted into electrical energy in the coil.
  • A participant explains that ideal inductors and capacitors do not dissipate real power but store reactive power, with energy stored in their respective fields being proportional to current and voltage.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which electromagnetic radiation loss becomes significant, particularly in relation to the size of the circuit compared to the wavelength of the AC signal.
  • One participant seeks clarification on whether a DC circuit experiences electromagnetic loss only during transient phases.
  • Another participant notes that for low-frequency circuits, the electrical length is often negligible, but this changes for RF/microwave circuits where electrical length must be considered.
  • There are mentions of complex power analysis in sinusoidal steady-state conditions, highlighting the intricacies involved in power calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the significance of electromagnetic radiation in circuits, with some suggesting it is negligible under certain conditions while others emphasize its relevance in specific contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent and conditions of electromagnetic loss in different circuit types.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the electrical size of a circuit may differ from its physical size, affecting the relevance of electromagnetic radiation loss. There are also references to specific frequency ranges where these effects become more pronounced.

PhysicsIgnorant
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello folks. This is Sandeep. I have many lingering doubts in physics that I am here to get cleared. This has become more of an issue ever since I decided to teach physics to my young nephew.

My first question pertains to electromagnetic waves and the conservation of energy.

Consider an AC circuit. It's power consumption P1 is the heat loss from resistance. The circuit will have an electrical and magnetic field associated with it. Let us now introduce a coil in the electrical and magnetic field of our circuit. We know that an electric current will be induced in the coil. There will be some power consumption in the coil, in the form of heat loss, due to the resistance of the coil. Let us call it P2.

My question is this: What is the source of the power P2? It may be argued that the coil will have to have its own power source, but there are some crystal receivers, which do not have their own power source.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsIgnorant said:
It's power consumption P1 is the heat loss from resistance

No, it's power loss is the sum of heat loss through resistance plus the energy radiated away in radio.
 
And part of the energy that is radiated away from the AC circuit via radio waves, becomes electrical energy in the coil, which ends up as... (you can complete this sentence). :oldwink:
 
An ideal inductor (which does not exist in nature) does not dissipate any real power. It stores reactive power. Heat dissipation in electrical components is like heat dissipation by friction in mechanical components. The power dissipated by heat has to come from somewhere though. The components of a circuit that have no power source will not dissipate any power (aside from background noise and/or incident radiation). An inductor is like a flywheel; it is an energy storing device. Energy is stored in the inductor's magnetic field. The energy stored in an inductor is proportional to the square of the current through the inductor.

Similarly, ideal capacitors (which do not exist in nature) do not dissipate any real power. They store reactive power. Energy is stored in the capacitor's electric field. The energy stored in a capacitor is proportional to the square of the voltage across the capacitor.

Duality is cool.
 
Please correct me if I am wrong, but perhaps the explanation on why I did not read about EM radiation loss in my physics textbook is because EM radiation becomes an issue only if the size of the circuit is comparable to the wavelength of the AC signal driving it (http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...ttle-questions-about-radiation-of-lc-circuits). Unless we are dealing with very high frequencies, this wavelength is much much much larger than the size of the circuit, so this loss is truly negligible. Is this correct?
 
Also, could you kindly confirm my understanding that a DC will experience EM loss only during the transient phase?
 
PhysicsIgnorant said:
Please correct me if I am wrong, but perhaps the explanation on why I did not read about EM radiation loss in my physics textbook is because EM radiation becomes an issue only if the size of the circuit is comparable to the wavelength of the AC signal driving it (http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...ttle-questions-about-radiation-of-lc-circuits). Unless we are dealing with very high frequencies, this wavelength is much much much larger than the size of the circuit, so this loss is truly negligible. Is this correct?

The size is the 'electrical' size of the circuit. This might be much smaller than the physical size of components. So if the electrical length is a small fraction, loss from EM radiation will usually be small in a circuit not designed to be an antenna.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_length
 
Last edited:
For low frequency circuits (so called "lump circuits"), electrical length is so small that it is completely neglected. When you start dealing with RF/microwave circuits, transmission lines, and antennas, then you have to take electrical length into consideration.

For lumped circuit analysis, just remember V = IR, Kirchoff's Current Law (KCL), Kirchoff's Voltage Law (KVL), i = c dv/dt (current through a capacitor), and v = L di/dt (voltage across an inductor). For sinusoidal, steady-state stuff, remember that ZL = j*omega*L, Zc = 1/(j*omega*C), and omega = 2*pi*f. Also, for sinusoidal, steady-state stuff, the power analysis can be tricky. That is, you have complex power (real dissipated power and imaginary reactive power), and leading / lagging power factors.

A good textbook on circuit analysis is the one by Hayt and Kemmerly: "Engineering Circuit Analysis."
 
EM_Guy said:
For low frequency circuits (so called "lump circuits"), electrical length is so small that it is completely neglected. When you start dealing with RF/microwave circuits, transmission lines, and antennas, then you have to take electrical length into consideration.

Sure it can be neglected until you deal with low frequency circuits (10s of khz) with fast rise/fall times and large currents like switching supplies that are used on everything today. The electrical length of cables and interconnects becomes large at the HF harmonics of the much lower switching.

http://www.egr.msu.edu/em/research/goali/notes/module11_conducted.pdf
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K