Embarassing question about eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Ok, so let us suppose we have a spinor which is a spin 1/2 state vector (a)
b

Now spinors exist in 2 dimensional complex space. How do I find the eigenvalues which correspond to the eigenvector
(a)
b


I am confused because we are dealing with eigenvalues for a matrix which is not a square matrix. I know for a square matrix we just find the eigenvalues such that the determinant of the matrix becomes zero. I am not sure how to deal with determinants of non-square matrices however. Helo anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in spin 1/2 space, the eigen vectors are usually found using the z component of the angular momentum. Use the Pauli matricies for S_{z} to find the eigenvalues and vectors.
 



Hi there,

First of all, there is no need to feel embarrassed about asking this question. Understanding eigenvectors and eigenvalues can be tricky, and it is completely normal to have questions about them.

To answer your question, in order to find the eigenvalues for a spinor, we need to first convert it into a square matrix. This can be done by taking the outer product of the spinor with its conjugate transpose. For your spinor (a, b), the corresponding square matrix would be:

|a|^2 a*b
a*b |b|^2

Now, to find the eigenvalues of this matrix, we can use the same method as with a regular square matrix - set the determinant equal to zero and solve for the eigenvalues. In this case, the determinant would be:

|a|^2 * |b|^2 - |a*b|^2 = 0

Solving this equation will give you the eigenvalues for your spinor. Keep in mind that since spinors are complex numbers, the eigenvalues will also be complex numbers.

I hope this helps clarify things for you. Don't hesitate to ask for further clarification if needed.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top