Embarassing question about eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Ok, so let us suppose we have a spinor which is a spin 1/2 state vector

(a)
(b)

Now spinors exist in 2 dimensional complex space. How do I find the eigenvalues which correspond to the above eigenvector



I am confused because we are dealing with eigenvalues for a matrix which is not a square matrix. I know for a square matrix we just find the eigenvalues such that the determinant of the matrix becomes zero. I am not sure how to deal with determinants of non-square matrices however. Helo anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eigenvectors only make sense for square matrices. Think about it. Suppose you have a mxn matrix and a nx1 vector. Multiplication will give a mx1 vector. In any case not a scalar multiple of itself.

The eigenvalues are determined by the matrix. not by the eigenvector itself. Si I can't answer the question:'How do I find the eigenvalues which correspond to the above eigenvector ' if I don't know the matrix.

EDIT: Whoops. This is physics ofcourse. The matrices you need are probably the Pauli spin-matrices. Use those.
 
Last edited:
See the other post on this subject...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top