Galfer
- 2
- 0
Hi all!
I'm studying electrical generators, and while I was trying to come up to the expression of EMF induced in a conductor I got two different results following two different ways, and I can't find the error.
With sinusoidal B, with e=bvl I get an RMS value E=2K_{f}f\phi, while with e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt} I get E=\pi K_{f}f\phi
Following the calculations; can you please tell me where the error is?
Case 1:
p = polar pairs
r = radius
ƒ = frequency
Kf = form factor
\tau=\frac{\pi r}{p}
v=2f\tau
E=K_{f}B_{m}lv=K_{f}\frac{\phi}{\tau l}l2f \tau=2K_{f}f\phi
Case 2:
e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d\phi}{dt}
E_{M}=\sqrt{2}E=\frac{1}{2}\phi_{M}\omega=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi2\pi f=\pi f\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi
E=\pi K_{f}f\phi
I thought it could be a \frac{2}{\pi} due to a mean value, but the flux is the same in both the expressions...
I'm studying electrical generators, and while I was trying to come up to the expression of EMF induced in a conductor I got two different results following two different ways, and I can't find the error.
With sinusoidal B, with e=bvl I get an RMS value E=2K_{f}f\phi, while with e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt} I get E=\pi K_{f}f\phi
Following the calculations; can you please tell me where the error is?
Case 1:
p = polar pairs
r = radius
ƒ = frequency
Kf = form factor
\tau=\frac{\pi r}{p}
v=2f\tau
E=K_{f}B_{m}lv=K_{f}\frac{\phi}{\tau l}l2f \tau=2K_{f}f\phi
Case 2:
e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d\phi}{dt}
E_{M}=\sqrt{2}E=\frac{1}{2}\phi_{M}\omega=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi2\pi f=\pi f\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi
E=\pi K_{f}f\phi
I thought it could be a \frac{2}{\pi} due to a mean value, but the flux is the same in both the expressions...
Last edited: