B Emission from a coated cathode and tunneling

Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary
What does the energy diagram of a coated cathode with tunneling look like?
I am wondering about an exercise exam question (it isn't homework): "at low temperatures (<2000 K), thermionic emission of a tungsten cathode depends on tunneling. By coating the tungsten with a suitable substance, the emission by tunneling can be greatly increased. Question: which two properties of the coating maximise the tunneling? Answer: the coating should be thin compared to the wavelength of the electrons, and the work function of the coating should be less than the work function of tungsten."

This exercise doesn't require the student to explain this further. However, I am curious about the shape of the barrier in an energy diagram. Below see my attempt in which the electron is tunneling through a vacuum barrier towards a positive anode. This attempt isn't very satisfactory. The exam answer seems to suggest the coating itself requires tunneling, so the coating seems to be an insulator, whereas in my diagram the coating is a conductor with a reduced work function. What should the energy diagram really look like?
tungsten1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of what type of coating that may lower the work function at the surface. This means that the tunneling barrier is lowered.

if you need an analogous reference, look at negative electron affinity photocathode.

Zz.
 
I do not know what type of coating may lower the work function at the surface. Another metal?
I suppose you mean my question is unclear and it has no straight answer?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top