EMT with pressure and volume question that might save lives

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhorsley42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the delivery of oxygen through concentrators, specifically the effectiveness of daisy chaining multiple units to achieve higher flow rates. EMTs express concern that while concentrators may be rated for 5 liters per minute (lpm), actual delivery can be significantly lower due to pressure loss over long tubing and restrictions at connections. It is debated whether using three concentrators at 5 lpm each can effectively provide 15 lpm to a patient, with doubts about the adequacy of nasal cannulas for such high flow rates. Recommendations include measuring output with flowmeters and considering larger diameter tubing to mitigate flow restrictions. Ultimately, there is skepticism about the ability to deliver the necessary oxygen volumes effectively using current methods.
jhorsley42
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am an EMT and have a concern. Some patients require high volumes of oxygen (as high as 15 liters per minute sometimes). Many times oxygen concentrators only go up to 5 lpm. It may be misleading to say 5 lpm because the machines have to operate based upon pressure rather than volume. 5 lpm is only what you'll get directly out of the nozzle. With a long hose, patients will receive about 1 lpm less per 5 or 6 feet. This is not exact, but I have witnessed this first hand. At nursing homes where they have these limited O2 concentrators, it is common practice to run a line out of each concentrator. These three lines are connected to two lines by three prong adapters. The two lines are connected to a single line nasal cannula using one three prong adapter. In this situation, is the patient actually receiving 15 lpm of O2? If a patient had three nasal cannulas in their nose simultaneously from three separate O2 concentrators at 5 lpm, would they be receiving 15 lpm of O2?

Diagram
__
__ --- ___
__ ---

Any help on this matter is greatly appreciated, as I am not convinced the daisy chaining method is actually getting patients the oxygen they need.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not believe 15 l/m O2 can be delivered via canula for the dilution. If you are concerned with the flow restriction of small gauge tubing then larger tubing is needed for the low delivery pressure.

IIRC, flow restriction is proportional to D/L
 
I'm not an expert on medical oxygen concentrators but I see they are based on pressure swing absorption (PSA) technology. It sounds like you're eluding to the concentrator flow being affected by the pressure on the outlet of the machine which could very well be the case for a PSA. The higher the discharge pressure of the PSA, the lower the flow capacity. If that's the case, then as Doug mentions, increasing the diameter of the tubing might help. This assumes the primary restriction is through that tubing of course, and not through the device at the nasal cannula.

It should be easy enough to measure the output of these oxygen concentrators using a rotameter (flowmeter). You can purchase one from McMaster Carr for about $100. Click on "For Use With: Oxygen" and "Flow Measured In: Liters".
http://www.mcmaster.com/#flow-rate-meters/=velohg
 
The cannula and tubing lumen are similar. At significant flow velocities the restrictions at the joints may be significant. When I built piping systems the total restriction was of concern and might militate to larger diameters.
 
Thanks for your replies! There is actually a flowmeter on the outside of the oxygen concentrator that looks just like some of the ones you linked me to. Doug, I think you're right about not being able to deliver 15 lpm via nasal cannula. We typically switch to a non-rebreather over 6 lpm. I certainly believe the tubing and joints to be limiting. Maybe there are tubes with higher diameter. If 5 lpm is coming out each of the three concentrators (as in my diagram), will it add up to 15 lpm going to the patient(assuming the cannula, non-rebreather, connectors, or tubes aren't choke points)? It seems that, according to Boyle's law, it should add up to 15 lpm. The issue is trying to put all that volume through a small diameter. Pressure might be forced to increase due to choke points, decreasing volume at the final output location. Do I have this right?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top