News Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a testimony presented by Norman R. Augustine, highlighting America's challenges in maintaining competitiveness and prosperity in the 21st century. Augustine emphasizes the critical role of quality jobs in sustaining the standard of living and the need for a vibrant consumer market to attract investment. He identifies the "Death of Distance" as a key factor affecting economic dynamics, where advancements in communication and information technology enable rapid and cost-effective information transfer, paralleling historical advancements in transportation.The committee's recommendations include significant investments in education, particularly in recruiting new science and math teachers, and establishing an Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E) to foster innovative energy research. Participants in the discussion express agreement with these proposals, advocating for a shift in funding from failing corporations to educational and research initiatives. There is also a mention of successful solar energy projects, illustrating practical applications of renewable energy solutions. Overall, the conversation reflects a consensus on the need for strategic investments in education and research to enhance America's economic future.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
Norman R. Augustine, Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Lockheed Martin Corporation

Chair, Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy
Division on Policy and Global Affairs
The National Academies

before the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives

October 20, 2005

http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/Gathering_Storm_Energizing_and_Employing_America2.asp#TopOfPage

Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee.

Thank you for this opportunity to appear before you on behalf of the National Academies’ Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. As you know, our effort was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine (collectively known as the National Academies). The National Academies were chartered by Congress in 1863 to advise the government on matters of science and technology.

The Academies were requested by Senator Alexander and Senator Jeff Bingaman, members of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources to conduct an assessment of America’s ability to compete and prosper in the 21st century—and to propose appropriate actions to enhance the likelihood of success in that endeavor. This request was endorsed by Representatives Sherwood Boehlert and Bart Gordon of the House Committee on Science.

To respond to that request the Academies assembled twenty individuals with diverse backgrounds, including university presidents, CEOs, Nobel Laureates and former presidential appointees. The result of our committee’s work was examined by over forty highly qualified reviewers who were also designated by the Academies. In undertaking our assignment we considered the results of a number of prior studies which were conducted on various aspects of America’s future prosperity. We also gathered sixty subject-matter experts with whom we consulted for a weekend here in Washington and who provided recommendations related to their fields of specialty.

It is the unanimous view of our committee that America today faces a serious and intensifying challenge with regard to its future competitiveness and standard of living. Further, we appear to be on a losing path. We are here today hoping both to elevate the nation’s awareness of this developing situation and to propose constructive solutions.

The thrust of our findings is straightforward. The standard of living of Americans in the years ahead will depend to a very large degree on the quality of the jobs that they are able to hold. Without quality jobs our citizens will not have the purchasing power to support the standard of living which they seek, and to which many have become accustomed; tax revenues will not be generated to provide for strong national security and healthcare; and the lack of a vibrant domestic consumer market will provide a disincentive for either U.S. or foreign companies to invest in jobs in America.

What has brought about the current situation? The answer is that the prosperity equation has a new ingredient, an ingredient that some have referred to as “The Death of Distance”. In the last century, breakthroughs in aviation created the opportunity to move people and goods rapidly and efficiently over very great distances. Bill Gates has referred to aviation as the “World Wide Web of the twentieth century”. In the early part of the present century, we are approaching the point where the communication, storage and processing of information are nearly free. That is, we can now move not only physical items efficiently over great distances, we can also transport information in large volumes and at little cost.

What does the US need to do to be competitive and prosperous?

Do you agree or disagree with the testimony?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/Gathering_Storm_Energizing_and_Employing_America2.asp#TopOfPage
What does the US need to do to be competitive and prosperous?
Do you agree or disagree with the testimony?
I have not read the whole transcript yet. I agree with their definition of the problems.

Propping up failing corportions with tax dollars is not the way to go however. We need education and R&D. I would rather see the billions given to the oil companies go to universities and alternate energy start ups.

I will ask again.

What would happen to the solar PV industry if we invested $200 billion in just subsidies to make home PV competitive with other sources of energy?

I will finish the transcript now and comment again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is an excellent suggestion.
• Recruitment of 10,000 new science and math teachers each year through the award of competitive scholarships in math, science and engineering that lead to a bachelor’s degree accompanied by a teaching certificate—and a 5-year commitment to teach in a public school.

This makes a lot of sense as well. Use the best research model available and apply it to the energy problem.
• Creation of an Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy (ARPA-E), modeled after DARPA in the Department of Defense, reporting to the Department of Energy Undersecretary for Science. The purpose is to support the conduct of out-of-the-box, transformational, generic, energy research by universities, industry and government laboratories.

I agree with most of it. Still reading. :smile:
 
Speaking of Solar -

These folks are seriously busy with solar - http://www.solarcraft.com/

Santa Rosa, CA (October 24, 2005) – Fountaingrove Athletic Club announced today that it has completed installation a new solar heating system for The Athletic Club’s 135,000-gallon, 4,500 square-foot pool. It is the largest solar heated pool in Santa Rosa. The new solar heating system maintains an average water temperature of 80 degrees, will save the athletic club thousands of dollars annually and eliminate hundreds of tons of harmful greenhouse gas emissions. The Solar Water Heating System consists of 75 high efficency FAFCO Revolution solar panels. The 3,600 square-feet of solar heat exchangers are mounted on hillside, ground-mounted racks and connected to the existing pool filtration system. An automatic temperature control system ensures that the natural gas-powered heater is in use only when needed to keep the pool temperature at 80 degrees. “It’s working well,” says Athletic Club Director, Darren Howey. “In fact, our pool has been operating at a constant 80 degrees Fahrenheit since the new system went operational in mid-August. We have used the gas water heater on an extremely limited basis.” The new system, installed by SolarCraft Services of Novato, enables Fountaingrove Athletic Club to eliminate the use of over 2 million cubic feet of Natural Gas per year and reduce emissions of 124 tons of greenhouse gases.

And -

http://www.everything-science.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=165&Itemid=1

Those crazy Californians! :biggrin:
 
Astronuc said:
Norman R. Augustine, Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Chair, Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy
Division on Policy and Global Affairs
The National Academies
before the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives
October 20, 2005
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/Gathering_Storm_Energizing_and_Employing_America2.asp#TopOfPage
What does the US need to do to be competitive and prosperous?
Do you agree or disagree with the testimony?
Great post, and likewise I'll need to take time to read in entirety...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with most of their assessments and recommendations.
It will be interesting to see if Congress and the Administration act on these recommendations. Since there was emphasis placed on Texas models, and Bush is so easily manipulated, I have high hopes.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top